You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The fourth of the group-struggles that Unit Y319 gathers under "civil rights" is that of American women, and it differs from the others in a defining respect: women were not a regional or ethnic minority but roughly half the population, present in every class and every racial group, so their campaign for equality cut across all the other themes and unfolded on the widest possible front — political, legal, economic, social and, in the second half of the period, bodily and reproductive. Their struggle also has a distinctive rhythm. It is conventionally understood in terms of "waves": a first wave that culminated in the vote in 1920, a long inter-war and post-war trough, and a second wave from the 1960s that pursued a far broader equality. A thematic study must resist narrating these as separate episodes. Instead it must ask an analytical question about change and continuity across the whole period: how far, and by what means, did the position of women change between 1865 and 1992, and why did the winning of formal rights — above all the vote — repeatedly fail to deliver the fuller equality that campaigners sought?
The organising question for this lesson is therefore: why did the achievement of the vote in 1920 not transform women's position as its supporters had hoped, and what combination of forces — economic change, war, organised feminism and legal action — eventually reopened and widened the struggle, only to leave the campaign for full equality still contested by 1992? Keep this question in view. The material below is organised not decade by decade but around the recurring tension between formal rights and substantive equality — a tension visible in the suffrage victory of 1920, the inter-war retreat, the ambiguous impact of wartime work, the second-wave feminism of the 1960s and 1970s, and the unresolved battles over the Equal Rights Amendment and reproductive rights.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
This lesson belongs to OCR H505 Unit Y319 (Thematic study and interpretations): Civil Rights in the USA 1865–1992, a UG3 thematic-study unit. Unit Y319 is assessed in two distinct ways. First, it is examined by thematic essays that range across the entire period 1865–1992 (AO1) — synoptic questions requiring analysis of change and continuity, similarity and difference, across more than a century, organised by theme rather than by decade. Second, it is examined by historical interpretations (AO3) focused on three named depth topics: the Gilded Age 1875–1895, the New Deal and civil rights 1933–1941, and Malcolm X and Black Power 1941–1970 (these interpretation topics are treated in later lessons). The present lesson develops the AO1 thematic-synthesis skill applied to women's rights across the whole period.
Within our own teaching sequence we treat women's rights as a distinct theme, placed fourth in the course, because it cuts across all the others — the racial divisions within the suffrage movement, women in the wartime labour force, the link between second-wave feminism and the Black freedom struggle — and because its two-wave rhythm makes it an especially clear test of the difference between formal rights and substantive equality. This is our pedagogical decision, not a transcription of the specification's ordering. The change-and-continuity threads foregrounded here — the gap between the vote and real power, the persistence of economic and domestic inequality, and the recurring interaction of feminism with the other rights movements — run across the whole unit. (Refer to the official OCR specification for exact wording.)
Because Y319 is a thematic study, the examiner rewards command of change over time across the whole period and judgements that compare different phases rather than narrating a sequence of campaigns. Throughout, keep asking how each development altered — or preserved — the distance between women's formal rights and their substantive equality.
The starting point of the theme is a movement already several decades old but far from its goal. The organised American women's-rights movement dated from the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848, whose "Declaration of Sentiments" had demanded equality including the vote. The aftermath of the Civil War, however, split the movement painfully: the Fifteenth Amendment (1870) enfranchised Black men but not women, and the dispute over whether to support an amendment that excluded women divided suffragists into rival organisations. This early fracture points to a continuity of the theme — the recurring tension between the women's movement and the other rights struggles, particularly over race.
By the late nineteenth century the campaign had matured into a mass movement pursuing the vote through two contrasting strategies:
| Organisation | Leader | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) | Carrie Chapman Catt | Patient state-by-state campaigns, lobbying and persuasion; a moderate, "respectable" approach |
| National Woman's Party (NWP) | Alice Paul | Militant tactics: picketing the White House, hunger strikes and civil disobedience, modelled partly on the British suffragettes |
By 1919 fifteen states, mainly in the West, had already granted women full suffrage. The decisive breakthrough came with the Nineteenth Amendment, ratified in August 1920, which barred the denial of the vote on grounds of sex. Several forces converged to produce it: decades of organisation and the combined pressure of moderate and militant wings; a succession of state-level victories; and, critically, the First World War, in which women's visible contribution to the war effort made the continued denial of the vote increasingly indefensible, converting even the previously lukewarm President Wilson to endorse suffrage as a "war measure" consistent with the democracy he claimed to defend abroad.
Yet the suffrage victory carried limitations that are central to the theme. First, it was racially bounded: many white suffragists, especially in the South, had argued for the vote explicitly as a means of reinforcing white supremacy, and African American women such as Ida B. Wells were marginalised within the movement — so that in practice Jim Crow continued to disenfranchise most Black women in the South for decades after 1920. Second, and more fundamentally for the theme, the vote did not transform women's wider position: women did not vote as a bloc, few won office, and the deeper inequalities of employment, pay, law and the household remained largely untouched. The first wave had won a great formal right, but the gap between that right and substantive equality remained wide.
The decades after 1920 illustrate one of the theme's most important lessons: the winning of a formal right did not sustain the momentum of the movement. With its unifying goal achieved, the suffrage coalition fragmented, and the inter-war years became a long trough in organised feminism. The image of the liberated "flapper" of the 1920s — the young woman who smoked, danced and challenged Victorian morality — captured a real change in manners and personal freedom, but it was largely a middle- and upper-class urban phenomenon, and it was not matched by comparable gains in economic or political power. Most women's lives, especially working-class and rural women's, changed little.
The movement did not vanish. The National Woman's Party turned to a new goal, first proposing an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in 1923 — an idea that would remain contested for the next sixty years. But feminism as a mass force was quiescent, and the priorities of the era lay elsewhere. Even the Great Depression and New Deal, transformative for labour, did little directly for women's equality: some New Deal codes entrenched lower pay for women, and the prevailing assumption that a scarce job should go to a male breadwinner intensified.
The Second World War then produced the period's most instructive case of change that failed to endure. With men mobilised, some six million women entered the workforce, many into skilled industrial jobs previously reserved for men — symbolised by the propaganda figure of "Rosie the Riveter" — and around 350,000 served in the women's branches of the armed forces.
| Wartime change | Its limit |
|---|---|
| Six million women entered the workforce, many in skilled industrial roles | They were typically paid markedly less than men for comparable work |
| Women gained a measure of economic independence and confidence | After 1945 many were pressured or required to surrender their jobs to returning veterans |
| The war demonstrated women's capabilities beyond the domestic sphere | The post-war years brought a powerful reassertion of the domestic ideal |
The post-war period saw not a consolidation of these gains but a conservative reaction: the celebration of suburban domesticity and the "feminine mystique" that idealised the housewife-mother. The historian Sara Evans has emphasised that the wartime experience nonetheless raised women's expectations and planted seeds that would flower two decades later, even as the immediate post-war years pushed many women back into the home. The thematic point is sharp: neither the vote (1920) nor mass wartime employment (1941–45) translated into durable equality, because the underlying structures of pay, law and domestic expectation were left intact. Formal or temporary change repeatedly failed to become substantive change.
The decisive reopening of the theme came in the 1960s, when a second wave of feminism transformed both the goals and the reach of the women's movement, moving far beyond the vote to challenge inequality across employment, law, the household and the control of women's own bodies. Its intellectual catalyst was Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique (1963), which named the "problem that has no name" — the frustration of educated women confined to domestic roles — and helped ignite a mass movement. The second wave also grew directly out of the other rights struggles of the era: many of its activists had been trained in the civil-rights and New Left movements, from which they drew both organising techniques and a language of liberation.
The gains of the second wave were rapid and wide-ranging:
| Development | Significance |
|---|---|
| Presidential Commission on the Status of Women (1961) | Chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt; documented pervasive discrimination and legitimised reform |
| Equal Pay Act (1963) | Required equal pay for equal work regardless of sex |
| Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (1964) | Banned employment discrimination on grounds of sex; became a powerful legal tool for women (the word "sex" was added partly by opponents hoping to sink the bill, but survived) |
| National Organization for Women (NOW, 1966) | Founded by Friedan and others as the leading vehicle of "liberal feminism", pursuing equality through legislation and the courts |
| Title IX (1972) | Barred sex discrimination in federally funded education, transforming women's access to education and sport |
The second wave was not monolithic. A liberal strand, embodied by NOW, pursued equality through law and institutions; a more radical "women's liberation" strand, growing out of the New Left, sought a deeper transformation of gender roles, sexuality and the family, and pioneered "consciousness-raising". The interaction of these strands — like the moderate–militant split of the suffrage era — broadened the movement's pressure even as it generated internal tension, a recurring pattern across the whole theme.
The final phase of the period shows, once again, that formal and legal advance did not settle the question of women's equality — and that by the 1990s some of the movement's central goals remained contested or unachieved. Two battles define the limits of the second wave.
The first was the Equal Rights Amendment. Passed by Congress in 1972 and sent to the states, the ERA — which would have written sex equality into the Constitution — at first seemed certain of ratification. But it provoked a powerful conservative counter-mobilisation, led by Phyllis Schlafly's "STOP ERA" campaign, which argued that the amendment threatened traditional family roles and women's existing protections. The ERA fell short of ratification by the extended deadline of 1982, a striking defeat that revealed both the strength of the anti-feminist backlash and the limits of the second wave's reach into more conservative America.
The second was reproductive rights. The Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade (1973), which established a constitutional right to abortion, was in one sense the second wave's most far-reaching victory, extending the idea of equality to control over women's own bodies. But it also became the focus of an enduring and bitter conflict: it galvanised a "pro-life" movement, made abortion a permanent fault-line in American politics, and left the right it established under continual challenge — so that reproductive rights, far from being settled, became one of the most contested issues of the period's final decades.
By 1992 the balance-sheet of the second wave was therefore mixed. Women's participation in higher education, the professions and the workforce had grown dramatically; a substantial body of anti-discrimination law was in place; and women were increasingly visible in politics. Yet the ERA had failed, reproductive rights were embattled, a persistent gender pay gap remained, and the "double burden" of paid work and domestic responsibility endured. The historian Nancy Cott, whose work traced the shifting meanings of American feminism, has emphasised how far the movement's very definition of equality changed over time — from the vote, to legal and economic equality, to the transformation of private life — a reframing that helps explain why "success" was always partial and always redefined. Formal and legal rights had been won on a scale unimaginable in 1920, but substantive equality remained, in important respects, unfinished.
Pulling the theme together across 1865–1992 reveals a pattern of dramatic advances in formal rights that repeatedly outran, but never fully delivered, substantive equality:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.