You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989 did not end the story of the Cold War in Europe; it opened its final and most turbulent chapter. Over the six years that followed, the continent was remade with a speed and completeness that would have seemed fantastical only a decade before. Germany, divided since 1945 and the very embodiment of the Cold War, was reunified within a single year. The Soviet Union, the superpower whose retreat had made the revolutions of 1989 possible, dissolved itself at the end of 1991 into fifteen successor states. The two great Cold War institutions of the East, the Warsaw Pact and Comecon, were wound up, while the Western institutions, NATO and the European Community, faced the question of what they were now for and how far they should expand into the space the Soviet bloc had vacated. And in the Balkans, the collapse of communism unleashed not the peaceful transition seen further north but the bloodiest European fighting since 1945, as Yugoslavia disintegrated into a succession of wars culminating in the horror of Bosnia. By 1995 a new Europe had taken shape — freer, more united in the West, but also, in its south-east, scarred by atrocity and shadowed by the limits of the post-Cold-War order.
The interest of this concluding topic lies in a problem of outcome and character. The peaceful revolutions of 1989 might have suggested that the end of the Cold War would be uniformly benign; instead its aftermath was strikingly uneven, combining the triumph of German reunification and the westward march of liberal democracy with the disintegration of a superpower and the return of genocidal war to European soil. The specification carries the story to 1995 precisely so that this unevenness can be weighed: the aftermath tests whether the end of the Cold War was, as some proclaimed at the time, a clean victory for the Western order, or a messier and more ambiguous settlement whose losers and casualties were as significant as its winners.
The organising question is therefore this: did the collapse of communism between 1989 and 1995 produce a stable, liberal, Western-oriented new order for Europe, or an unstable and violent transition whose achievements in the centre were shadowed by disintegration in the East and atrocity in the Balkans — and how far had a genuinely new European order actually taken shape by 1995? How one answers determines whether the end of the Cold War is read as a triumph, a tragedy, or an unfinished and ambiguous transformation.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
This lesson belongs to OCR H505 Unit Y223 (Non-British period study): The Cold War in Europe 1941–1995. Within our own teaching sequence it completes the coexistence-and-endgame thread by carrying the story past the fall of the Wall to the remaking of the whole continent, and it is where the unit's terminal date of 1995 does its analytical work. We have organised the material around the analytical tension between triumph and tragedy — the uneven combination of liberal success in the centre with disintegration and atrocity in the East and South-east — rather than following the specification's own listing order, because that tension is the intellectual spine of the debate about the Cold War's aftermath and clarifies the significance of the events far better than a strict chronological survey would. This arrangement is our pedagogical choice, not a transcription of the specification. (Refer to the official OCR specification for exact wording.)
Because Y223 spans more than half a century and ends in 1995, this lesson is where the whole period's change over time comes into focus: the Europe of 1995 is to be set against the divided continent of 1945 that opened the unit. Keep the European dimension central: this is the reshaping of Europe, so the German settlement, the fate of the Soviet space and the Balkan wars matter more than developments beyond the continent. Ask, at every stage, how far a genuinely new and stable order had actually emerged.
The most immediate consequence of the fall of the Wall was the reunification of Germany, achieved with astonishing speed. Once the border was open, the East German state — the German Democratic Republic — began to hollow out: its citizens continued to leave for the West in large numbers, its economy was visibly bankrupt, and the demonstrators who had chanted "we are the people" (wir sind das Volk) began to chant "we are one people" (wir sind ein Volk). The question was no longer whether the two Germanies would come together but how, and how quickly, and — crucially — whether the outside powers who still held rights over Germany as a defeated nation would permit it.
The West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl seized the moment with decisive energy, setting out a plan for confederation and then unification and pressing the pace against more cautious counsel. The decisive diplomacy concerned Germany's international status, and here the central issue was whether a reunified Germany would belong to NATO. For the Soviet Union, the prospect of a united Germany inside the Western alliance — the very country that had invaded Russia in 1941, now enlarged and armed within the hostile bloc, with NATO's frontier advanced to the Oder — was deeply alarming, and few observers expected Gorbachev to accept it.
| Step | Date | Substance |
|---|---|---|
| Economic and monetary union | 1 July 1990 | The West German mark became the currency of East Germany, binding the two economies together ahead of political union |
| The "Two Plus Four" talks | 1990 | Negotiations between the two German states and the four occupying powers (USA, USSR, Britain, France) on the external aspects of unification |
| Kohl–Gorbachev agreement | July 1990 | Gorbachev accepted that a reunified Germany could remain in NATO, in exchange for financial aid, a cap on German forces, and a German renunciation of nuclear weapons |
| Two Plus Four Treaty | 12 September 1990 | The four powers renounced their remaining rights over Germany, restoring full sovereignty; Germany confirmed the Oder–Neisse border with Poland |
| Reunification | 3 October 1990 | The five eastern Länder acceded to the Federal Republic; Germany was formally reunified |
That Gorbachev accepted German reunification within NATO was one of the most remarkable concessions of the entire period, and it astonished contemporaries. His reasons were partly financial — Germany provided substantial credits to a desperate Soviet economy — and partly a matter of his own "new thinking", which no longer regarded a German presence in NATO as the mortal threat older Soviet doctrine had assumed; there were, in addition, Western assurances about the character of the new order that would later become the subject of bitter dispute in Russian eyes. But the concession was also a measure of Soviet weakness: by mid-1990 Gorbachev was in no position to resist, and the alternative — a confrontation over Germany — was beyond his crumbling means. The historian Mary Elise Sarotte has emphasised how far the shape of the settlement was determined in these months by rapid, sometimes improvised diplomacy, and by the skill with which Kohl and the American administration secured a united Germany anchored firmly in the West. Reunification on 3 October 1990 effectively ended the Cold War division of Europe at its very centre: the country whose partition had been the Cold War was whole again, and inside the Western alliance.
The same forces that Gorbachev had unleashed abroad now consumed the Soviet Union itself. His reforms had, unintentionally, reanimated the national question — the aspirations of the many non-Russian nations that the Soviet state, and the Russian empire before it, had gathered under central rule. Glasnost gave those aspirations a voice; the manifest weakening of the centre gave them an opportunity; and the example of Eastern Europe's liberation gave them a model. From 1990 the non-Russian republics moved towards independence, beginning with the Baltic states, which had never accepted their annexation by Stalin in 1940.
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| March 1990 | Lithuania declares independence — the first republic to break away | Opened the disintegration of the Union along national lines |
| June 1991 | Boris Yeltsin elected President of the Russian Republic | Created a rival, popularly elected authority to Gorbachev's Soviet presidency |
| August 1991 | A hardline coup against Gorbachev collapses within days | Discredited the hardliners, shattered Gorbachev's authority, and empowered Yeltsin and the republics |
| 8 December 1991 | The leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus declare the USSR dissolved (the Belavezha Accords) | The decisive legal act ending the Soviet Union |
| 25 December 1991 | Gorbachev resigns; the Soviet flag is lowered over the Kremlin | The symbolic end of the Soviet state |
| 26 December 1991 | The Soviet Union formally ceases to exist | Fifteen successor states emerge from the former superpower |
The decisive turn was the failed coup of August 1991. A group of hardliners, alarmed at the imminent signing of a new union treaty that would have devolved power to the republics, seized power in Moscow, placing Gorbachev under house arrest at his holiday dacha. But the plotters were irresolute, and they had fatally misjudged the mood of the country. Boris Yeltsin, defying the coup from atop a tank outside the Russian parliament, rallied popular resistance, and within three days the coup collapsed. Its consequences were the opposite of what the plotters intended: it discredited the hardline defenders of the Union, shattered what remained of Gorbachev's authority, banned the Communist Party, and handed the initiative decisively to Yeltsin and the republics. The reform of a state had become the dissolution of an empire. When the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus met at Belavezha in December and declared the Soviet Union at an end, they were ratifying a collapse that the failed coup had already made unstoppable. On 25 December 1991 Gorbachev resigned, the red flag came down over the Kremlin, and the superpower that had defined half a century of European history simply ceased to be.
The historian Serhii Plokhy has argued that the decisive solvent of 1991 was precisely this national question — the drive of the non-Russian republics, and not least of Russia itself under Yeltsin, for sovereignty — which turned Gorbachev's attempt to reform the Union into its disintegration. The distinction between the end of the Cold War and the end of the Soviet Union is analytically important: the Cold War in Europe was effectively over by 1990, with the revolutions and German reunification, whereas the Soviet Union dissolved separately in December 1991, driven substantially by internal national forces. Conflating the two obscures the distinct causes of each.
The collapse of communism dissolved the institutions of the Eastern bloc and posed searching questions for those of the West. The Warsaw Pact, the Soviet military alliance, was formally wound up in 1991, and Comecon, its economic counterpart, was dissolved in the same year. The disappearance of the Eastern bloc left the Western institutions — NATO and the European Community — facing the question of their purpose and their future extent in a Europe without a Soviet threat.
For NATO, the end of the Cold War raised the question of whether an alliance created to contain the Soviet Union had any role now that the Soviet Union was gone, and, if it did, how it should relate to the newly liberated states of Eastern Europe and to a diminished Russia. Rather than dissolve, NATO began to redefine itself and to reach out cautiously eastwards: the Partnership for Peace programme, launched in 1994, offered the former communist states a framework of cooperation short of full membership, while the question of actual enlargement — of admitting former Warsaw Pact states into NATO itself — was raised but, within our period, not yet resolved. The issue was delicate, because eastward expansion risked alarming and antagonising a Russia that already felt encircled and betrayed; the seeds of a later and lasting tension in European security were sown in these years, even though the great enlargements lay beyond 1995.
For the European Community, the end of the Cold War coincided with, and accelerated, a deepening of Western European integration. The Maastricht Treaty, signed in 1992 and in force from 1993, transformed the Community into the European Union, committing its members to a path towards a single currency and a common foreign and security policy and greatly extending the scope of integration. Reunified Germany, now the Union's most powerful member, was firmly anchored within this deepening structure — an outcome that reassured those who remembered the dangers of an unmoored Germany. At the same time the newly free states of Central Europe — Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia (soon to divide peacefully into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993) — began to look towards eventual membership of both the EU and NATO, orienting themselves decisively towards the West, though their accession too lay beyond our period. By 1995, then, the Western institutions had not dissolved with the threat that created them but had begun instead to deepen and, tentatively, to expand into the space the Soviet collapse had opened.
If the collapse of communism was largely peaceful in Central Europe and in the dissolution of the USSR, in the Balkans it was catastrophic. Yugoslavia — a federation of six republics and several nationalities, held together since 1945 by the communist party and, until his death in 1980, by the personal authority of Tito — disintegrated in the early 1990s into the bloodiest European fighting since the Second World War. The reasons for this divergence from the peaceful pattern elsewhere are central to the analysis of the aftermath.
Where the collapse of communism in Central Europe channelled national feeling towards liberal democracy and integration with the West, in Yugoslavia it was captured and inflamed by nationalist leaders — above all the Serbian leader Slobodan Milošević — who exploited ethnic grievance to build power on the ruins of the communist order. As the federation weakened, its constituent republics moved towards independence, but their populations were ethnically mixed, so that the drawing of new national borders became a matter of life and death for the minorities left on the wrong side.
| Stage | Date | Events |
|---|---|---|
| Slovenia and Croatia secede | 1991 | Slovenia's brief war ends quickly; Croatia's war against Serb forces and the Yugoslav army is far bloodier and more protracted |
| Bosnia-Herzegovina | 1992 | Bosnia declares independence; its Serb population, backed by Belgrade, rebels, and war engulfs the ethnically mixed republic |
| The siege of Sarajevo and "ethnic cleansing" | 1992–95 | Bosnian Serb forces besiege the capital and drive out non-Serb populations in a campaign of "ethnic cleansing" |
| The Srebrenica massacre | July 1995 | Bosnian Serb forces murder around eight thousand Bosnian Muslim men and boys — the worst atrocity in Europe since 1945, later judged an act of genocide |
| The Dayton Agreement | November–December 1995 | US-brokered settlement ends the Bosnian war, partitioning Bosnia into two entities within a single state |
The Bosnian war of 1992–95 was the darkest episode of the post-Cold-War aftermath in Europe. The term "ethnic cleansing" entered the world's vocabulary to describe the systematic expulsion and killing of populations to create ethnically homogeneous territories; the Bosnian capital Sarajevo endured a siege of nearly four years; and in July 1995 the massacre at Srebrenica, where around eight thousand Bosnian Muslim men and boys were murdered after the town's fall, became the worst single atrocity on European soil since the Nazi era and was subsequently judged an act of genocide. The war exposed the impotence and hesitancy of the international community: United Nations peacekeepers were deployed but were unable to prevent the atrocities, and it was only decisive American diplomatic and military pressure that finally produced the Dayton Agreement at the end of 1995, which halted the fighting by partitioning Bosnia along ethnic lines within a single, fragile state.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.