You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
A child watching Saturday-morning television is not merely being entertained; they are being addressed — sold to, shaped, and quietly taught what kind of person they are supposed to be. Advertising aimed at children is a multi-billion-pound industry precisely because it works, and among the things it teaches, alongside which cereal to want, is a lesson about gender: that some toys, tones and worlds belong to boys and others to girls. How advertising exerts this influence — and in particular how the very voices in adverts encode gender stereotypes — is the subject of the second Social topic of the OCR child option: the impact of advertising on children. Following the applied-option format, the Background sets out how television advertising influences children and how it conveys gender stereotyping. The Key research is Fern Johnson and Karen Young's (2002) content analysis, Gendered voices in children's television advertising, taught in full depth. The Application is a strategy to reduce advertising's impact on children, evaluated critically. This social-area topic foregrounds the free-will/determinism debate — are children shaped by media, or active interpreters of it? — and the socially-sensitive question of protecting children from commercial influence.
| This lesson covers | OCR H567 Component 03, Section B topic | AO focus |
|---|---|---|
| How TV advertising influences children; gender stereotyping (background) | Child psychology — Impact of advertising on children (Social) | AO1; AO2 |
| Johnson & Young (2002): aim, content-analysis method, sample, categories | Key research — gendered voices in children's advertising | AO1; AO2 |
| Results: gendered language, voice-overs and themes | Key research — findings and conclusions | AO1 |
| Evaluation: reliability of content analysis, causation, ethnocentrism, dating | Key research — evaluation; issues and debates | AO3 |
| Application: a strategy to reduce advertising's impact | Child psychology — application | AO2; AO3 |
The specification is referenced descriptively throughout; consult the official OCR H567 specification document for the exact published wording. This lesson develops AO1 (advertising's influence and detailed knowledge of the study), AO2 (understanding content analysis and applying it to a protective strategy) and AO3 (evaluating the study, especially inference and causation from content analysis). Full citation: Johnson, F. L. & Young, K. (2002) Gendered voices in children's television advertising, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(4), 461–480.
Children are a uniquely vulnerable advertising audience for developmental reasons. Young children struggle to grasp the persuasive intent of advertising: below about seven or eight, many do not reliably understand that an advert is a deliberate attempt to sell them something rather than neutral information or entertainment, so they lack the critical defence an adult brings. Children also have pester power — the ability to influence family purchases by nagging — which makes them a lucrative target. And because children are still forming their tastes, identities and social understanding, advertising can shape not only what they want but what they think is normal, desirable and appropriate for someone like them. Advertising reaches children through repetition, appealing characters, catchy jingles, and association of products with fun, popularity and happiness.
One powerful way advertising shapes children is by conveying gender stereotypes — culturally shared beliefs about how boys and girls (and men and women) differ and what suits each. Children's advertising has long been observed to be sharply gender-segmented: adverts for action figures, construction and vehicles are pitched at boys with fast pacing, loud music, aggressive or dominant themes and outdoor/active settings; adverts for dolls, grooming and domestic play are pitched at girls with gentler pacing, soft music, themes of nurturance, appearance and cooperation, and indoor settings. Through social learning (Bandura's mechanism — children observe and imitate models, especially same-sex ones) and through repeated association, such advertising can teach children that certain interests, behaviours and even ways of speaking are "for boys" or "for girls", reinforcing stereotypes that shape their self-concept and aspirations. Johnson and Young focused on a subtle but pervasive channel for this: the language and voices used in the adverts themselves.
Definition — gender stereotype. A culturally shared, oversimplified belief about the characteristics, roles and behaviours considered typical or appropriate for males versus females. Advertising can transmit and reinforce such stereotypes to children.
It is worth being precise about the mechanisms by which advertising is thought to influence children, because a strong answer names them rather than gesturing vaguely at "influence". Several operate together. Social learning is central: children observe models in adverts — often attractive, aspirational, same-sex figures having fun with a product — and are disposed to imitate them, especially when the modelled behaviour is rewarded (the child in the advert is popular, happy, admired). Classical association links products with positive feelings by pairing them repeatedly with pleasant music, bright colour, laughter and success, so the product itself comes to evoke those feelings. Mere exposure and repetition breed familiarity and preference: a jingle heard fifty times, a character seen daily, becomes liked simply through repeated contact. And, at the cultural level, the sheer consistency of gendered messaging across thousands of adverts contributes to what media theorists call a cultivation effect — the gradual shaping of a child's sense of what the social world is normally like, including what boys and girls are "supposed" to be. Naming these mechanisms matters because the application later works by interrupting them — media literacy attacks the credulous imitation, exposure limits attack the repetition, and de-gendered advertising attacks the consistency of the message.
A further piece of background worth carrying into the evaluation is the developmental trajectory of children's advertising understanding. Research broadly finds that very young children (below about five) often cannot even reliably distinguish adverts from programmes; by around six to eight many can tell adverts apart and recognise they aim to sell, but only in later childhood do children reliably grasp the persuasive and biased nature of advertising — that adverts deliberately present products in the best possible light and cannot be taken at face value. This trajectory is crucial for both the study and its application: it explains why children are uniquely vulnerable (the defence that adults take for granted is developmentally unavailable to the youngest), and it dictates that any protective strategy must be pitched to the child's level of understanding and revisited as that understanding matures.
Gender stereotyping in advertising also matters because of its possible downstream consequences for children's aspirations and self-concept. If a girl repeatedly sees that adverts for science kits, construction and vehicles are pitched at boys — fast, loud, action-filled — while adverts addressed to her emphasise appearance, caring and domesticity, she may, through the mechanisms described below, come to see certain interests and futures as "not for her". Psychologists worry that such messaging can subtly narrow children's sense of the possible along gender lines, feeding into later differences in confidence and even subject and career choices. This is why the topic is treated as socially significant rather than trivial: the concern is not that a child prefers one toy, but that a relentless, consistent cultural message about what boys and girls are may shape the child's developing identity in ways that outlast any single purchase.
Because the study is a content analysis, it is worth understanding the method. Content analysis is a research technique for systematically and objectively quantifying the content of communication — here, television adverts. The researcher defines coding categories in advance (for example, the gender of the voice-over, or the type of verb used), then samples the material and counts how often each category occurs, turning qualitative material (adverts) into quantitative data (frequencies) that can be compared. Its great virtue is that it studies real-world media unobtrusively; its characteristic challenges are ensuring coder reliability (that different coders categorise the same content the same way) and the fact that it describes content but cannot, on its own, prove effects on the audience.
Johnson and Young set out to examine the language used in American television advertisements aimed at children, and specifically how that language is gendered — that is, how adverts targeted at boys, at girls, or at both differ in their verbal content, voice-overs and themes. Their aim was to document, systematically, the ways in which children's advertising uses language to construct and reinforce gender stereotypes, extending earlier work on the images in such adverts to the relatively neglected dimension of words and voices.
The study was a content analysis of a large sample of American television commercials aimed at children. The researchers analysed several hundred adverts — on the order of around 470 commercials — broadcast over a period in the late 1990s (across a couple of years), recorded from children's programming. Each advert was categorised by its target audience: adverts aimed predominantly at boys, predominantly at girls, at both boys and girls, or neutral/mixed. The researchers then coded features of the language, in particular the verbal content (the words spoken), the voice-overs (who narrates — a male or female voice), and recurring linguistic and thematic patterns, applying predefined categories consistently across the sample.
The analysis revealed pervasive and systematic gendering of the language in children's advertising.
Voice-overs. A striking and much-cited finding concerned the gender of the narrating voice. The great majority of voice-overs were male, even in adverts aimed at girls — the authoritative "voice of authority" narrating the advert was overwhelmingly male, while female voices were used more selectively. This pattern itself conveys a stereotype: authority and narration are coded male.
Gendered language and themes. The language differed sharply by target audience. Adverts aimed at boys tended to use more action-oriented, aggressive and dominant language — words emphasising power, control, competition and destruction (e.g. verbs of forceful action), delivered at a faster, louder pace. Adverts aimed at girls tended to use language emphasising feelings, nurturance, appearance, cooperation and limited action — softer, gentler wording, with more emphasis on relationships, love and prettiness. Certain categories of word clustered by gender: for example, boys' adverts featured more words connoting power and action, girls' adverts more words connoting feeling and affiliation. The themes mirrored this: competition, control and antagonism for boys; collaboration, nurturing and appearance for girls.
Both/neutral adverts. Adverts aimed at both sexes, or neutral products, tended to show less extreme gendering, confirming that the strong patterns were specifically tied to gender-targeted marketing.
| Feature | Boys' adverts | Girls' adverts |
|---|---|---|
| Voice-over gender | Predominantly male | Predominantly male (female used selectively) |
| Language emphasis | Action, power, control, competition, aggression | Feelings, nurturance, appearance, cooperation |
| Pace and tone | Faster, louder | Softer, gentler |
| Recurring themes | Domination, destruction, winning | Relationships, love, prettiness |
Johnson and Young concluded that children's television advertising uses gendered language systematically to construct and reinforce gender stereotypes — teaching children, through both the content of the words and the gender of the voices, that action, power and authority are masculine while nurturance, appearance and feeling are feminine. The predominance of male voice-overs, even in girls' adverts, conveys that authority is male. Because advertising is so pervasive and repetitive, the authors argued, it is a significant agent of gender socialisation, one that channels children's understanding of what it means to be a boy or a girl. The study documents the mechanism — the gendered language — through which advertising can transmit stereotypes, even though (as a content analysis) it describes the adverts rather than directly measuring their effect on children.
This topic foregrounds the free-will versus determinism debate. A strongly deterministic reading treats children as passively shaped by the relentless gendered messages of advertising — moulded into stereotyped preferences and self-concepts. A more agentic reading insists children are active interpreters who negotiate, resist and reinterpret media messages, and whose gender development draws on many sources (family, peers, school, culture) beyond advertising. The balanced position is that advertising is one significant socialising influence among many — powerful because pervasive and repetitive, but not omnipotent, and mediated by the child's own developing understanding. The study also connects to social learning theory (Component 02, Bandura): advertising provides gendered models for children to observe and imitate, with same-sex models especially influential — which is exactly why gender-targeted adverts are so effective.
A top-band answer weighs the study's objectivity and real-world relevance against the limits of content analysis and its dated, culture-bound sample.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.