You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 9 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
We are inclined to think of the brain as hardware we are born with — a fixed organ whose wiring is laid down by our genes before we ever open our eyes. Colin Blakemore and Grahame Cooper's celebrated study of kittens overturns that intuition. It is the classic study for the biological-area theme of brain plasticity, and its central finding is startling: the visual brain is not simply pre-wired at birth but is physically shaped by early visual experience. Kittens reared so that they saw only vertical stripes, or only horizontal stripes, grew up with visual systems — and behaviour — moulded to the world they had been shown, effectively blind to the orientation they had never seen. The environment, in other words, does not merely fill an already-built brain with information; it helps to build the brain itself.
Casey and Sperry, the regions-of-the-brain pair, showed that different parts of the brain do different jobs. Blakemore and Cooper's study opens a different question — not where function sits, but how the brain comes to be organised in the first place, and how far that organisation depends on experience. This lesson tells the study in the OCR "tell the story" format: the background, the aim, the method (design, sample and procedure), the results with their real findings, the conclusions, and a full evaluation — one that must confront squarely the animal-ethics dimension, since the study's power and its ethical cost are inseparable. It closes by linking the study to its theme, area, perspective and the debates it fuels. Because Blakemore and Cooper anchor so much of what students understand about the developing brain, knowing it precisely is one of the highest-yield investments for Component 02.
| This lesson covers | OCR H567 Component 02 element | AO focus |
|---|---|---|
| Blakemore & Cooper (1970): background, aim, method, results, conclusions | Section A — Core studies (Biological); theme: brain plasticity (classic) | AO1 knowledge |
| Evaluation: method, data type, ethics (animal research), validity, reliability, sampling, generalisability | Section A; Section B debates | AO3 evaluation |
| Applying the deprivation logic and plasticity findings to novel material | Section C — Practical applications | AO2 application |
| Links to area, perspective and debates (nature–nurture; reductionism–holism; ethics of animal research; science) | Section B — Areas, perspectives, debates | AO1; AO3 |
The specification is referenced descriptively; consult the official OCR H567 specification document for its exact published wording. This lesson develops AO1 (accurate knowledge of the background, method, results and conclusions), AO3 (evaluating the study's methodology, data and — centrally — its animal ethics) and AO2 (recognising and applying the deprivation logic and plasticity findings to unfamiliar situations).
Three pieces of prior knowledge frame the study, and stating them clearly is the foundation of a good answer.
The visual cortex contains orientation-selective neurons. The primary visual cortex of mammals — cats and humans alike — contains neurons that respond selectively to lines and edges of particular orientations. A given neuron might fire vigorously to a vertical bar in its part of the visual field but hardly at all to a horizontal one; another neuron shows the opposite preference. Across the visual cortex, the full range of orientations is represented, and this orderly arrangement of orientation-selective cells is the physiological basis of our ability to see edges, shapes and contours. The pioneering recordings of single visual-cortex neurons in cats, which established the existence of these orientation detectors, set the stage: the obvious next question was whether this exquisite organisation is innate or built by experience.
The nature–nurture question about the developing brain. Two positions were available. On a strongly nativist view, the orientation-selective architecture of the visual cortex is genetically pre-specified and simply unfolds with maturation, regardless of what the animal sees. On an empiricist or experience-dependent view, the visual environment during early life plays a causal role in shaping which neurons develop and how the cortex is organised. Blakemore and Cooper's study was designed to adjudicate between these — to test whether restricting an animal's early visual experience to a single orientation would leave a lasting mark on its visual cortex and behaviour.
Critical (sensitive) periods and deprivation studies. Developmental biology had established that there are critical or sensitive periods early in life during which the nervous system is especially malleable and dependent on appropriate input to develop normally. If the visual cortex has such a window, then depriving an animal of certain visual input during it should have effects that later normal experience cannot fully undo. The logical way to test this — impossible and unethical in human infants — is a controlled deprivation experiment in an animal: raise it in an environment stripped of one kind of visual information and examine the consequences for its brain and behaviour. This is precisely the design Blakemore and Cooper adopted, and it is why the study is an animal study: the manipulation could not be performed on a human child.
The historical motivation, then, was to settle a fundamental question about the developing brain — is its visual architecture fixed by genes or sculpted by experience? — using the one method capable of yielding causal evidence: controlled early deprivation in a non-human animal.
The overarching aim was to investigate whether early visual experience shapes the development of the visual cortex and visual behaviour — that is, to test the plasticity of the developing visual system. Specifically, Blakemore and Cooper set out to determine whether rearing kittens in an environment containing only one orientation of contour (only vertical, or only horizontal, stripes) would produce lasting effects on (a) the kittens' visual behaviour — whether they could respond to contours of the orientation they had never seen — and (b) the physiological organisation of their visual cortex — specifically the orientation preferences of their visual-cortex neurons. Underlying this was the theoretical aim of adjudicating the nature–nurture question for the visual brain: would the cortex develop its full complement of orientation detectors regardless of experience (nature), or would it develop only the detectors matching the animal's restricted visual world (nurture)?
Design. The study is a controlled laboratory experiment using animals, in which the independent variable was the orientation of the visual environment in which each kitten was reared (vertical stripes versus horizontal stripes), and the dependent variables were the kittens' subsequent visual behaviour and the orientation preferences of their visual-cortex neurons. Because the researchers manipulated the rearing environment, the design permits genuinely causal inference about the effect of early experience — the great methodological advantage that justified an animal study.
Sample. The participants were kittens reared from a very young age under the controlled visual conditions. From around two weeks of age they were placed in the special environment for the critical developmental period, spending a limited number of hours each day in it and otherwise being kept in complete darkness, so that essentially all their patterned visual experience was of the single orientation. The use of a non-human animal is central to what the study could achieve and to its ethical evaluation.
Materials and apparatus. The key apparatus was a specially constructed environment restricting visual experience to one orientation. Each kitten was placed inside a tall cylinder whose interior walls were covered with high-contrast stripes of a single orientation — either all vertical or all horizontal. The kitten stood on a clear platform, and a wide collar prevented it from seeing its own body, so the only visual contours available were the stripes of the one orientation. Under these conditions a "vertical" kitten saw only vertical edges and a "horizontal" kitten only horizontal edges for the crucial early weeks. To assess the physiological effect afterwards, the researchers used single-cell recording — inserting a microelectrode into the visual cortex to measure which orientations individual neurons responded to.
Procedure. The procedure had two linked phases:
Rearing phase (the manipulation). From about two weeks of age, each kitten spent several hours a day in the striped cylinder — some seeing only vertical stripes, others only horizontal — and was kept in the dark for the remaining time. This continued through the sensitive period of visual development (over a period of some months), so that the developing visual cortex received patterned input of one orientation only.
Testing phase (the dependent variables). After the rearing period, the kittens were brought into a normally lit environment and their visual behaviour was observed: whether they could perceive and respond to objects and contours of different orientations, and in particular whether they were effectively "blind" to the orientation they had never experienced. Then, in the physiological phase, single-cell recordings were taken from the visual cortex to determine the orientation preferences of the neurons — whether the cortex had developed detectors for all orientations, or only for the orientation the kitten had been reared to see.
Throughout, the experimental logic was clean: hold everything constant except the orientation of early visual experience, then measure the consequences for both behaviour and the physical brain.
The findings were dramatic and consistent, and they map cleanly onto the deprivation logic.
The kittens showed profound behavioural deficits — effectively blind to the unseen orientation. When first brought into the normal world, the kittens were markedly abnormal in their vision. They showed no startle or "visual placing" response to objects approached in certain ways, they blundered into things, and — most tellingly — they behaved as though they could not see contours of the orientation they had never experienced. A kitten reared with only vertical stripes would respond to a vertical rod (for instance, following or reaching for it) but appeared blind to a horizontal rod, and vice versa for a horizontally-reared kitten. The deficit was orientation-specific: the animals could perceive the orientation they had been reared with but were behaviourally unresponsive to the orthogonal one.
The visual cortex had developed only the detectors matching the reared orientation. The physiological recordings explained the behaviour. In a normal cat, visual-cortex neurons collectively prefer the full range of orientations. In the deprived kittens, however, the neurons responded only to orientations close to the one the kitten had been reared to see: a vertically-reared kitten's cortex had cells tuned to vertical (and near-vertical) contours but lacked cells responsive to horizontal contours, and the reverse held for horizontally-reared kittens. There was, in effect, a gap in the cortical representation corresponding exactly to the orientation of which the kitten had been deprived. The physical organisation of the visual brain had been sculpted by early experience to match the impoverished environment.
The effects were largely lasting. Crucially, these deficits did not simply correct themselves once the kittens experienced a normal, richly-oriented world. The behavioural blindness to the deprived orientation, and the corresponding absence of the relevant cortical detectors, persisted — indicating that the early deprivation had produced a durable change during a sensitive period, not a temporary state that ordinary later experience could readily reverse. Some behavioural recovery occurred over time in certain respects, but the fundamental orientation-specific deficit was long-lasting.
Behaviour and physiology corresponded. The most persuasive feature of the results is the match between the two dependent variables: the orientation a kitten was behaviourally blind to was precisely the orientation for which its cortex lacked detectors. This tight correspondence between the physical state of the brain and the animal's visual capability is what makes the study such compelling evidence that experience shapes the brain, and that the brain in turn determines behaviour.
| Reared environment | Behaviour toward reared orientation | Behaviour toward deprived orientation | Visual-cortex neurons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Only vertical stripes | Responds (e.g. follows a vertical rod) | Effectively blind to horizontal contours | Detectors for vertical/near-vertical; lacks horizontal detectors |
| Only horizontal stripes | Responds (e.g. follows a horizontal rod) | Effectively blind to vertical contours | Detectors for horizontal/near-horizontal; lacks vertical detectors |
Blakemore and Cooper drew several conclusions, and it is worth stating them carefully.
First, and most fundamentally, the development of the visual cortex is strongly influenced by early visual experience — the brain is plastic, physically shaped by the environment during a sensitive period, rather than wholly pre-wired by genes. The orientation-selective architecture of the visual cortex is not simply innate; it develops in response to the contours the animal actually sees.
Second, there appears to be a critical or sensitive period early in life during which the visual cortex is especially malleable and during which appropriate visual input is necessary for normal development. Deprivation within this window produces effects that ordinary later experience cannot fully reverse, which is why the deficits were largely lasting.
Third, the study demonstrates a direct correspondence between brain organisation and behaviour: the animals were behaviourally blind to precisely the orientation for which their cortex lacked detectors. Perception depends on having the relevant neural machinery, and if experience fails to build that machinery, the corresponding perceptual ability does not develop. This is a powerful vindication of the biological assumption that behaviour rests on physical brain structure.
Fourth, and more broadly, the study reframes the nature–nurture question for the developing brain. It shows that the two are not simply opposed alternatives: nature provides a visual cortex capable of developing orientation detectors, but nurture — early experience — determines which detectors actually develop. Nature and nurture are therefore interactive, the environment physically completing what the genes begin.
A full OCR evaluation weighs the study's research method, its data, its ethics — here, centrally, its animal ethics — and its validity, reliability, sampling and generalisability.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 9 lessons in this course.