You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson teaches you the negation test — the single most powerful technique for identifying assumptions in UCAT Decision Making questions. Mastering this test gives you a reliable, systematic method that works on every assumption question, even under time pressure.
The negation test is based on a simple principle: if an assumption is true, then negating it should weaken or destroy the argument.
Argument: "The hospital should introduce a new appointment booking system. Patient surveys show that 60% of patients are dissatisfied with the current system."
Proposed assumption: Patient dissatisfaction with the booking system can be resolved by changing the system.
Apply the negation test:
Negate it: "Patient dissatisfaction with the booking system CANNOT be resolved by changing the system."
If this were true, would the argument still hold? No. If changing the system cannot resolve dissatisfaction, there is no point in introducing a new system. The argument collapses.
Conclusion: This IS an assumption of the argument. ✓
Argument: "The government should fund a public health campaign about the dangers of excessive sugar consumption. Rates of Type 2 diabetes have risen by 30% over the past decade."
Which of the following is an assumption of this argument?
A. Type 2 diabetes is the most common chronic disease in the country. B. Excessive sugar consumption is a significant contributor to Type 2 diabetes. C. The government has not previously funded any public health campaigns. D. All people who consume excessive sugar will develop Type 2 diabetes.
Option A: "Type 2 diabetes is NOT the most common chronic disease."
Does the argument require diabetes to be the MOST common disease? No. Even if it is the second or third most common, a 30% rise is still concerning. The argument still holds. → Not an assumption. ✗
Option B: "Excessive sugar consumption is NOT a significant contributor to Type 2 diabetes."
If sugar does not significantly contribute to diabetes, then a campaign about sugar dangers would not address the rising diabetes rates. The argument collapses. → This IS an assumption. ✓
Option C: "The government HAS previously funded public health campaigns."
Even if previous campaigns existed, the argument could still justify funding a new one. The argument does not depend on the absence of previous campaigns. → Not an assumption. ✗
Option D: "NOT all people who consume excessive sugar will develop Type 2 diabetes."
The argument does not claim that ALL sugar consumers get diabetes. It only claims that sugar is dangerous enough to warrant a campaign. Even if only some sugar consumers develop diabetes, the argument still holds. → Not an assumption. ✗
Answer: B
Use this exact protocol in the UCAT:
| Step | Action | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Read the argument and identify the conclusion | 10 seconds |
| 2 | Read the first option | 5 seconds |
| 3 | Negate the option mentally | 3 seconds |
| 4 | Ask: "Does the argument collapse?" | 5 seconds |
| 5 | If yes → it is an assumption. If no → move to next option | 2 seconds |
| 6 | Repeat for remaining options | 15–20 seconds |
| Total | 40–45 seconds |
An assumption, when negated, should make the argument significantly weaker or completely untenable. A slight weakening may not be enough — look for the option whose negation causes the most damage.
Make sure you negate the statement correctly:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.