You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Weighted averages and index numbers occasionally appear in UCAT DM data interpretation questions. They test whether you understand that combining data from groups of different sizes requires weighting, and whether you can spot the dangers of aggregating data inappropriately. This lesson also introduces Simpson's paradox — a counter-intuitive phenomenon where a trend that appears in subgroups reverses when the groups are combined.
Simple average=Number of valuesSum of all values
A simple average treats every value equally. This is appropriate when all groups are the same size.
Weighted average=∑weights∑(value×weight)
A weighted average accounts for the size or importance of each group.
| Situation | Use |
|---|---|
| Same-sized groups | Simple average is fine |
| Different-sized groups | Weighted average required |
| Individual data points | Simple average is fine |
| Group summaries with different Ns | Weighted average required |
Two hospital sites report patient satisfaction scores. Site A has 200 patients and an average score of 85. Site B has 800 patients and an average score of 72. What is the overall average satisfaction score?
Wrong (simple average): (85 + 72) / 2 = 78.5
Correct (weighted average):
200+800(200×85)+(800×72)=1,00017,000+57,600=1,00074,600=74.6
The correct answer (74.6) is much closer to Site B's score (72) than to Site A's score (85), because Site B has four times as many patients.
UCAT Tip: Whenever you see averages from groups of different sizes, you MUST use the weighted average. The simple average of the group averages is almost always wrong.
Simpson's paradox occurs when a trend observed in subgroups reverses when the data is combined. It is one of the most important concepts in statistical reasoning, and it occasionally appears in UCAT DM questions.
| Department A | Department B | |
|---|---|---|
| Male applicants | 50 applied, 40 admitted (80%) | 400 applied, 200 admitted (50%) |
| Female applicants | 400 applied, 340 admitted (85%) | 50 applied, 30 admitted (60%) |
Within each department, women have a HIGHER admission rate:
But overall:
Wait — in this example, women have a higher overall rate too. Let me adjust the numbers to show the paradox properly.
| Department A (hard to get in) | Department B (easy to get in) | |
|---|---|---|
| Male applicants | 10 applied, 1 admitted (10%) | 90 applied, 72 admitted (80%) |
| Female applicants | 80 applied, 16 admitted (20%) | 20 applied, 18 admitted (90%) |
Within each department, women have a HIGHER admission rate:
But overall:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.