You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Confidentiality dilemmas are among the most nuanced SJT scenarios. They test your ability to navigate the tension between maintaining patient privacy and other competing obligations — including safeguarding, public safety, and the duty of care. This lesson presents the most common confidentiality scenario types with fully analysed worked examples.
Default position: Maintain confidentiality. Every departure from this default must be justified by a specific, legitimate reason.
Someone you know personally (a friend, family member, or fellow student not involved in the patient's care) asks you about a patient. This is one of the most common confidentiality scenarios in SJT.
You must not share any patient information with anyone who is not directly involved in the patient's care — regardless of:
Scenario: Your flatmate, who is also a medical student, asks: "I heard Mrs Taylor was admitted to your ward. Is she OK? She is my neighbour and I am worried about her."
| Action | Rating | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Explain that you cannot share any information about patients on your ward, even to confirm whether someone is there | Very appropriate | Maintains confidentiality completely; even confirming admission status is a breach |
| Say "She is fine, do not worry" because it seems like harmless reassurance | Very inappropriate | Any disclosure — even that the patient exists and is "fine" — breaches confidentiality |
| Suggest your flatmate contact Mrs Taylor directly or through her family | Very appropriate | Redirects the enquiry without breaching confidentiality |
| Tell your flatmate the diagnosis because they are a fellow medical student | Very inappropriate | Being a medical student does not create a legitimate need-to-know for patients on a different ward |
| "Harmless" information | Why it is still a breach |
|---|---|
| "Yes, she is on the ward" | Confirms admission — which they may not have known for certain |
| "She is doing well" | Implies you have access to her records and know her condition |
| "I cannot say, but do not worry" | The reassurance itself implies you know something positive |
| "I have seen her around" | Confirms presence without explicit disclosure, but still breaches the principle |
You or a colleague posts something on social media that could relate to a patient, a clinical experience, or a placement setting.
| Rule | Explanation |
|---|---|
| No identifiable information | Do not post anything that could identify a patient — even indirectly |
| "Jigsaw identification" | A combination of details (ward, condition, approximate age, date) can identify a patient even without a name |
| No clinical photos | Never photograph clinical settings, patients, or patient-related materials |
| The persistence problem | Social media posts can be screenshotted, shared, and archived — they are never truly private |
Scenario: A fellow student posts on a private group chat: "Just had the most amazing learning experience. A young woman came in with a really rare condition I have never seen before — [describes the condition in detail]. Ward 7B, Royal Free Hospital."
| Action | Rating | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Message the student privately and explain that the post could identify the patient (rare condition + age + ward + hospital = identifiable) | Very appropriate | Addresses the issue directly and educates the student |
| Report the student to the medical school | Appropriate, but not ideal | A valid step, but a private conversation should come first unless the student has been warned before |
| Ignore it because the chat is "private" | Very inappropriate | Private group chats can be screenshotted; the breach is real regardless of the platform's privacy settings |
| Reply in the group chat asking the student to remove the details | Appropriate, but not ideal | Addresses the issue but draws more attention to the details in the group; a private message is better |
A patient's family member wants information about the patient's condition, treatment, or prognosis.
Step 1: Has the patient given explicit consent for information to be shared with this person?
Step 2: Does the patient have capacity?
Step 3 (patient lacks capacity): Would sharing information be in the patient's best interest?
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.