You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Healthcare teams are under constant pressure, and conflict is inevitable. SJT tests your ability to navigate disagreements, address underperformance, handle difficult supervisors, and communicate effectively within a team. The correct answers consistently value patient-centred resolution, direct communication, and professional escalation.
| Principle | What it means |
|---|---|
| Patient care comes first | Any team conflict must be resolved in the interest of the patient, not personal egos |
| Direct communication | The first step is usually to talk to the person directly, privately, and professionally |
| Escalation when needed | If direct communication fails or is inappropriate, escalate to a supervisor or senior |
| Respect for all roles | Every team member's contribution is valued, regardless of seniority |
| No gossip | Discussing concerns with uninvolved colleagues (rather than with the person or a supervisor) is unprofessional |
A colleague (often a fellow student or junior team member) is consistently failing to meet expected standards — arriving late, making errors, not completing tasks, or providing substandard care.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Speak to the colleague privately — express your concern, ask if they are OK, be specific about what you have observed |
| 2 | Offer support — they may be struggling with personal issues, workload, or health problems |
| 3 | If the behaviour continues, raise it with your shared supervisor |
| 4 | If patient care is at risk, the concern must be escalated regardless of personal feelings |
Scenario: A fellow medical student on your placement has been arriving late and leaving early for the past two weeks. They have missed several patient interactions and their portfolio is incomplete. They seem withdrawn and unlike their usual self.
| Action | Rating | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Speak to them privately, express concern for their wellbeing, and ask if there is anything wrong | Very appropriate | Compassionate, direct, and addresses the issue at the human level |
| Report them to the medical school immediately | Inappropriate, but not awful | Jumps over the direct approach; may be necessary later, but not the ideal first step |
| Cover for them by signing them in as present when they are late | Very inappropriate | Dishonest; enables the problem; could put future patients at risk |
| Tell other students that they are not pulling their weight | Inappropriate, but not awful | Gossip does not solve the problem and damages the colleague's reputation |
| If your conversation does not lead to improvement, suggest they speak to their personal tutor or pastoral support | Very appropriate | Constructive escalation that supports the colleague |
A supervisor (consultant, registrar, or senior nurse) dismisses your concerns, ignores your input, or does not take you seriously because you are a student.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Restate your concern clearly using evidence and facts |
| 2 | If dismissed again, escalate to another senior colleague |
| 3 | If the dismissiveness is a pattern, raise it with your medical school or educational supervisor |
| 4 | If patient safety is at immediate risk, do not accept dismissal — escalate immediately |
Scenario: You raise a concern with the registrar about a patient's medication. The registrar responds: "You are just a student. Focus on learning and leave the prescribing to the qualified staff."
| Action | Rating | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Calmly explain that you believe the concern is valid and ask if it could at least be checked | Very appropriate | Persistent, professional, and focused on patient safety |
| Accept the registrar's response and say nothing further | Inappropriate, but not awful | Defers to hierarchy at the expense of potential patient safety |
| Approach the consultant or another senior doctor and explain your concern | Very appropriate | Appropriate escalation after being dismissed |
| Argue with the registrar publicly on the ward | Inappropriate, but not awful | The concern is valid but the approach is unprofessional |
| Document the interaction and your concern in case the issue arises later | Appropriate, but not ideal | Good practice but should not replace active escalation |
Two or more members of the clinical team disagree about the best course of action for a patient. The disagreement may be professional (clinical judgement) or personal (interpersonal conflict).
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.