You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
With 69 questions in 26 minutes, you have approximately 23 seconds per question. This lesson provides a comprehensive strategy for managing time, making rapid decisions, understanding the scoring system, and maximising your band score under exam conditions.
| Component | Time |
|---|---|
| Total exam time | 26 minutes (1,560 seconds) |
| Number of questions | 69 |
| Average time per question | ~22.6 seconds |
| Time per scenario (typically 2–4 questions) | ~45–90 seconds |
23 seconds is not a lot. To put it in context:
This means SJT is not a test where you carefully weigh every option. It is a test where you apply trained judgement rapidly. The preparation you do before the exam is what matters most — in the exam itself, you execute.
| What to do | How to do it |
|---|---|
| Identify the setting | Hospital ward? GP surgery? Medical school? Social situation? |
| Identify the characters | Who is involved? What are their roles? |
| Identify the ethical tension | What is the core conflict? Patient safety? Confidentiality? Integrity? Hierarchy? |
| Identify the question type | Appropriateness (rate actions) or Importance (rate considerations)? |
| What to do | How to do it |
|---|---|
| Apply the priority hierarchy | Patient safety → raising concerns → protocol → personal comfort |
| Use the quick-check | Safety check → professional standards check → degree check |
| Go with your trained instinct | Your first answer, informed by preparation, is usually correct |
| Do not second-guess | Changing answers under time pressure often makes them worse |
| What to do | How to do it |
|---|---|
| Select your answer | Click/mark it confidently |
| Flag if uncertain | If you are genuinely torn, flag the question and move on |
| Do not dwell | The next question is waiting; time spent deliberating is time stolen from other questions |
Research on SJT-style assessments consistently shows that first instincts are more accurate than changed answers, provided the candidate has prepared adequately.
| Reason | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Pattern recognition | Your brain recognises scenario types you have studied and applies the correct framework automatically |
| Overthinking introduces doubt | Deliberating too long allows irrelevant factors ("but what if...") to cloud your judgement |
| Emotional reasoning creeps in | The longer you think, the more likely you are to answer based on feelings rather than principles |
| Time pressure worsens later decisions | If you spend too long on early questions, you rush later ones and make more errors |
Override your first instinct only if:
| Deliberate (spend a few extra seconds) | Go with your gut (commit immediately) |
|---|---|
| The scenario contains an unusual or complex ethical dilemma | The scenario is a clear-cut patient safety, honesty, or confidentiality issue |
| Two options seem equally valid | One option is clearly more aligned with the priority hierarchy |
| The wording of the scenario contains a subtle detail that changes the answer | The scenario is a common type you have practised before |
| You genuinely cannot identify the ethical tension | The ethical tension is obvious |
If you have spent more than 10 seconds evaluating a single action or consideration, commit to an answer and move on. The partial credit system means being one step off is only 1 mark lost — but running out of time on later questions could cost you many more marks.
Your total raw marks across all 69 questions are converted into a band:
| Band | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Band 1 | Consistently strong alignment with expert panel judgement |
| Band 2 | Mostly aligned, with some discrepancies |
| Band 3 | Significant discrepancies from expert judgement |
| Band 4 | Substantial misalignment with expected professional values |
Because of partial credit:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.