You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
If there is one skill that separates good interview candidates from exceptional ones, it is the ability to think out loud. This is especially true for Oxbridge interviews, where the entire point is to watch you reason through problems in real time — but it matters in every type of university interview.
Most students are not used to sharing their thought process. In exams, you think silently and write down your final answer. In classroom discussions, you usually contribute ideas you have already worked out. An interview is different: the interviewer wants to hear the messy, uncertain, evolving process of your thinking, not just the polished conclusion.
Interviewers are making a decision about whether to teach you for three or four years. They already know your grades from your UCAS application. What they cannot learn from a piece of paper is how your mind works.
flowchart TD
A[What the interviewer sees] --> B{Silent candidate}
A --> C{Thinking-out-loud candidate}
B --> D[Only sees final answer]
B --> E[Cannot assess reasoning process]
B --> F[Cannot offer helpful hints]
C --> G[Sees logical reasoning]
C --> H[Sees intellectual honesty]
C --> I[Can intervene and guide]
C --> J[Gets far more evidence]
D --> K[Limited assessment]
E --> K
F --> K
G --> L[Rich, detailed assessment]
H --> L
I --> L
J --> L
When you think out loud, you give the interviewer evidence of:
An interviewer who cannot hear your thinking can only assess your final answer. An interviewer who can hear your thinking can assess your entire cognitive process. This gives them far more evidence to work with — and far more opportunities to be impressed.
The fundamental skill is to verbalise what your brain is doing as it works through a problem. This means saying things like:
"My first instinct is... because..."
"I am thinking about this in terms of..."
"That does not quite work, because..."
"What if I approach it from a different angle..."
"This reminds me of... which might be relevant because..."
Here is a reference table of phrases for different stages of reasoning:
| Stage of Thinking | Useful Phrases |
|---|---|
| Starting | "My initial thought is..." / "The first thing that comes to mind is..." / "Let me start by considering..." |
| Reasoning | "If that is the case, then..." / "This suggests that..." / "The implication would be..." |
| Questioning | "But wait — what about..." / "I am not sure that holds because..." / "That raises the question of..." |
| Connecting | "This is similar to..." / "This links to something I studied about..." / "There is a parallel here with..." |
| Correcting | "Actually, let me reconsider..." / "I think my initial approach was wrong because..." / "A better way to think about this is..." |
| Concluding | "So on balance..." / "The key point seems to be..." / "My conclusion, with the caveat that..." |
Interviewer: "Why might a hospital in a cold climate use more energy per patient than a hospital in a warm climate, even if they have the same number of patients?"
Weak response (silent thinking, then a single answer):
"Because they have to use heating."
Strong response (thinking out loud):
"Okay, so the most obvious reason is heating — a cold climate requires more energy to maintain a comfortable temperature in the building. But let me think about whether there are other factors...
Actually, cold weather might also mean more patients with respiratory conditions or hypothermia, so the hospital might be busier even if the headline patient number is the same — more emergency admissions, longer stays.
And then there are things like gritting car parks, keeping water pipes from freezing, extra laundry from additional blankets...
Also, in very cold climates, the days are shorter in winter, so lighting costs would be higher too.
So heating is the obvious answer, but there is actually a whole network of secondary effects."
The second answer reaches the same initial conclusion but reveals a mind that probes further, considers multiple factors, and connects ideas. The interviewer learns far more about this candidate's thinking.
One of the most powerful thinking-out-loud techniques is to use conditional reasoning explicitly:
"If this organism lacks a cell wall, then it cannot be a plant cell, which means..."
"If we assume that demand is elastic, then a price increase would lead to a larger decrease in quantity demanded, so..."
"If this poem was written during the First World War, then the imagery of 'no man's land' might be literal rather than metaphorical..."
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.