You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This final lesson draws together the threads of the entire anthology, examining how attitudes to love, desire, gender, sexuality, and marriage evolve across five centuries — from Wyatt's Tudor court to Dowson's fin-de-siècle despair. The aim is to equip you with the comparative frameworks and analytical strategies you need for Paper 1, Love Through the Ages of the AQA A-Level English Literature A exam, where the pre-1900 poetry is examined by comparison in response to a thematic question. The lesson is therefore less a body of new content than a method: a way of holding eleven poems in a single mind so that, faced with any thematic prompt, you can move fluently between them, marshal the dominant poetic methods, and build a genuinely comparative argument rather than two essays stapled together.
This capstone belongs to AQA A-Level English Literature A (7712), Paper 1, Love Through the Ages: poetry (pre-1900), where poems are examined by comparison across the ages. Because the paper sets an unseen thematic question across the anthology, every Assessment Objective is in play at once, and the skill being tested is synthesis:
Flagging the dominant AOs: Across the anthology, AO2 and AO4 carry every answer. The thematic question is only a doorway; what is rewarded is integrated comparison of method. AO3 supplies the historical pressure that explains why the methods differ; AO5 supplies the competing readings; AO1 is the argumentative thread. The single most important habit this lesson teaches is to keep two poems live in the same sentence.
Before examining themes, it is worth reminding ourselves what the examiners are looking for:
| AO | What It Means | How to Hit It |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 | Informed personal response, using literary terminology | Develop your own argument; use precise technical vocabulary (enjambment, volta, caesura, conceit, etc.) |
| AO2 | Analyse language, form, and structure | Close-read specific words and phrases; explain how form contributes to meaning |
| AO3 | Contextual understanding | Show how historical, social, literary, and biographical contexts shape meaning |
| AO4 | Connections across texts | Explicitly compare poems — do not write two separate essays stapled together |
| AO5 | Different interpretations | Engage with critical perspectives; offer alternative readings |
One of the anthology's central preoccupations is the question: what is love? The answers vary enormously across the five centuries.
In "Whoso List to Hunt," love is a chase — the lover pursues the beloved as a hunter pursues a deer. But the chase is futile: the hind belongs to "Caesar," and the speaker is "of them that farthest cometh behind." Love is defined by its impossibility; the desire is real but the object is unattainable.
Sonnet 116 attempts to fix love as an unchanging constant — "an ever-fixed mark / That looks on tempests and is never shaken." Love is not a feeling but a metaphysical principle, existing beyond time and change. Yet the poem's accumulation of negatives ("not," "never," "nor no") may betray an anxiety that this definition is aspirational rather than descriptive.
For the metaphysical and carpe diem poets, love is inseparable from rhetoric. Donne's "The Flea" and Marvell's "To His Coy Mistress" present love (or at least desire) as something to be argued for — a proposition requiring evidence and logical structure. Love becomes a performance of wit.
The libertine poets split on whether sexual love is a form of freedom or a form of bondage. Lovelace's "The Scrutiny" presents infidelity as cheerful liberty; Rochester's "Absent from Thee" presents it as a curse — the speaker cannot stop himself from straying, even though straying destroys him.
"The Garden of Love" defines love negatively — by what institutions (the Church, social convention) do to destroy it. Love is natural, joyful, and free; religion binds it with "briars." Blake's love is defined by its enemies.
For Burns, Rossetti, and Hardy, love is inseparable from loss. "Ae Fond Kiss" mourns a parting; "Remember" anticipates death; "At an Inn" laments a love that can never be consummated. In each case, love is defined by what it lacks — presence, continuation, fulfilment.
"La Belle Dame sans Merci" and Dowson's "Cynara" poem present love as an enchantment from which the speaker cannot escape. The beloved becomes an inescapable presence — haunting the knight on his cold hillside, falling as a shadow between Dowson's speaker and his temporary lovers.
The anthology spans a period of enormous change in gender relations, but certain patterns recur.
In most of the anthology's poems, men look and women are looked at. Byron's "She Walks in Beauty" is the clearest example: the woman is entirely an object of contemplation, described but never heard. Wyatt's hind is a creature to be hunted. Keats's Belle Dame is seen, touched, and interpreted but never speaks in a language the knight can understand.
Rossetti's "Remember" is the anthology's most powerful assertion of female agency within the sonnet tradition. The dying woman controls the terms of her own remembrance and, in the volta, demonstrates a selflessness that challenges the male tradition of possessive love.
Hardy's "'Melia" in "The Ruined Maid" is given voice within a dialogue, and her sharp, ironic responses expose the hypocrisy of the moral code that has "ruined" her.
The anthology is haunted by the sexual double standard: men are praised (or at least tolerated) for sexual experience; women are destroyed by it. Lovelace's speaker cheerfully plans to "love my round" and return; the woman is expected to wait faithfully. Hardy's "The Ruined Maid" exposes this standard with savage irony. Rochester acknowledges his own double standard but cannot escape it.
There is a broadly traceable movement across the anthology:
| Period | Attitude |
|---|---|
| Tudor/Elizabethan | Women as objects of desire — idealised (Shakespeare) or pursued (Wyatt) |
| 17th century | Women as targets of persuasion (Donne, Marvell) or expected to tolerate male infidelity (Lovelace) |
| Romantic | Women as symbols — of nature (Blake), of beauty (Byron), of dangerous otherness (Keats) |
| Victorian | Women beginning to speak — Rossetti seizes the sonnet; Hardy gives voice to the "ruined" woman |
| Decadent | Women as absent obsessions — Dowson's Cynara is a memory, not a presence |
The anthology explores a persistent tension between the physical and the spiritual dimensions of love.
Several poems connect desire with mortality:
One of the anthology's great arguments is whether love can survive the passage of time.
The anthology also tracks how historical changes reshape the language and conventions of love poetry:
| Period | Convention | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Petrarchan | The unattainable beloved; the suffering lover | Wyatt |
| Elizabethan | The sonnet sequence; love as philosophical problem | Shakespeare |
| Metaphysical | The conceit; love as intellectual argument | Donne |
| Carpe diem | The urgency of time; seize the day | Marvell |
| Cavalier | Sprezzatura; love as social performance | Lovelace |
| Restoration | Libertinism; love as appetite | Rochester |
| Romantic | Authenticity; love as natural feeling vs. institutional repression | Blake, Burns, Byron, Keats |
| Victorian | Respectability; love constrained by social codes | Rossetti, Hardy |
| Decadent | Excess and exhaustion; love as obsession | Dowson |
A thread easily missed but enormously useful in the exam is the anthology's persistent recruitment of religious language to the secular business of love and desire. Time and again, poets reach for the most sacred vocabulary available to them — and the way they handle it is a sharp index of period and attitude.
The comparative payoff is large: a single essay can trace how the same religious vocabulary is made to forbid (Wyatt), to titillate (Donne), to aggrandise (Marvell), to repress (Blake), to ennoble (Rossetti) and to console-without-saving (Dowson) — a five-century shift from a culture in which the sacred frames all experience to one in which it survives only as borrowed emotional colour. This is among the most sophisticated AO3/AO4 arguments the anthology supports.
Choose a theme (e.g., "How poets present unfulfilled desire") and track it through your two chosen poems. Use the theme as a spine that holds your essay together, but allow room for each poem's individuality.
Example: If comparing Marvell's "To His Coy Mistress" with Hardy's "At an Inn," the spine might be "both poets explore desire that cannot be fulfilled, but Marvell argues for action while Hardy is paralysed by circumstance."
Compare how the poems' forms create meaning. This is particularly effective when the poems use contrasting forms to address similar themes.
Example: Rossetti's Petrarchan sonnet ("Remember") and Hardy's dialogue ("The Ruined Maid") both address Victorian gender roles, but Rossetti's closed form enacts restraint and selflessness, while Hardy's open dialogue allows the "ruined" woman to speak back.
Use AO3 to drive the comparison. Show how the poets' different historical moments produce different attitudes to the same subject.
Example: Donne's "The Flea" (written c.1590s, in a culture where metaphysical wit was admired) and Dowson's "Cynara" (written 1891, in a culture exhausted by Victorian morality) both deal with the relationship between physical pleasure and emotional commitment, but their cultural contexts produce opposite strategies: Donne argues that the physical is trivial; Dowson shows that the physical cannot satisfy.
Build your essay around a debate. State a position, support it with one poem, then challenge it with the other.
Example: "Shakespeare's Sonnet 116 argues that true love is eternal and unchanging. Burns's 'Ae Fond Kiss' suggests the opposite — that love's intensity is inseparable from its transience. Which view is more convincing, and how does each poet's use of form support their position?"
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.