You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
If romantic love is the positive pole of Paper 1 Section A, then jealousy, possession, and control represent its dark counterpart. Shakespeare is fascinated by what happens when love becomes distorted — when desire turns to obsession, affection to domination, trust to paranoia. Across all four set plays, Shakespeare explores the mechanisms by which love is corrupted, producing some of the most psychologically penetrating writing in the English language.
Paper 1, Section A: Shakespeare (AQA 7712). Set text: Othello, with reference to Measure for Measure, The Winter's Tale and The Taming of the Shrew.
AO Focus in this lesson Weight here AO1 Argument connecting jealousy/control back to the idea of love; terminology of manipulation and rhetoric Developed AO2 Strong. How Iago's rhetorical method and Othello's collapsing language enact jealousy Strong AO3 The honour code, cuckoldry anxiety, racial prejudice, and absolutist royal power Developed AO5 The central Bradley/Leavis dispute; postcolonial readings; the "no-cause" problem in The Winter's Tale Strong Section A assesses AO1, AO2, AO3 and AO5 (not AO4). The discriminating move in this topic is to treat jealousy not as a free-standing theme but as a distorted theory of love — what each jealous character believes love to be, and what the distortion reveals.
Othello's jealousy is the most extensively dramatised in the Shakespeare canon. It is also the most debated: is Othello a naturally jealous man whose insecurity Iago exploits, or a noble man destroyed by a villain of extraordinary cunning?
Act 3 Scene 3 is one of the longest and most important scenes in Shakespeare. Over the course of approximately 480 lines, Iago transforms Othello from a man secure in his love to a man consumed by jealous rage. The key techniques:
| Technique | Example | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Insinuation | "Ha! I like not that" (3.3.35) — a throwaway comment about Cassio leaving Desdemona | Plants suspicion without making a direct accusation; Othello's imagination does the work |
| Echoing | "Indeed?" / "Honest, my lord?" / "Think, my lord?" — Iago repeats Othello's words back as questions | Creates the impression that Iago knows more than he is saying; forces Othello to articulate his own fears |
| False reluctance | "I am not bound to that all slaves are free to" (3.3.138) — Iago pretends he does not want to speak | Makes his eventual "revelations" seem more credible because they appear involuntary |
| Appeal to knowledge | "In Venice they do let God see the pranks / They dare not show their husbands" (3.3.206–07) | Uses racial and cultural prejudice to undermine Othello's trust in Desdemona |
| The handkerchief | "Have you not sometimes seen a handkerchief / Spotted with strawberries in your wife's hand?" (3.3.438–39) | Transforms an innocent object into "ocular proof" — the physical evidence Othello demands |
Othello's language undergoes a devastating transformation. Compare the eloquent verse of Act 1:
"She loved me for the dangers I had passed,
And I loved her that she did pity them." (1.3.168–69)
with the fragmented, bestial imagery of Act 4:
"Lie with her? lie on her? — We say lie on her, when they belie her. — Lie with her! that's fulsome. — Handkerchief — confessions — handkerchief!" (4.1.35–37)
The collapse from verse into prose, from measured sentences into ejaculatory fragments, from human language into animal imagery ("Goats and monkeys!" — 4.1.263) — this is Shakespeare dramatising the destruction of a man's identity through jealousy.
AO5 — Critical Interpretations: A.C. Bradley argues that Othello is "the most romantic figure among Shakespeare's heroes" and that his tragedy lies in the destruction of a fundamentally noble nature. F.R. Leavis counters that Othello's supposed nobility is self-dramatisation — that he has a "habit of self-approving self-dramatisation" that makes him susceptible to Iago. Edward Said and postcolonial critics read Othello's vulnerability as inseparable from his racial otherness in Venetian society.
The Taming of the Shrew presents love as a power struggle in which one partner systematically dominates the other. Petruchio's methods include:
| Method | Example | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Contradicting reality | "I say it is the moon that shines so bright" (4.5.4) when the sun is shining | Forces Katherine to deny the evidence of her own senses — a form of psychological domination (sometimes compared to gaslighting) |
| Denying food and sleep | "And with the clamour keep her still awake" (4.1.189) | Petruchio explicitly compares this to hawk-taming: subduing a wild creature through deprivation |
| Redefining identity | Petruchio insists Katherine is mild, sweet, and compliant even when she is furious | By refusing to engage with her anger, he denies her the identity she has constructed for herself |
| Controlling clothing | He rejects the cap and gown Katherine wants (4.3) | Clothing is identity; controlling what Katherine wears is controlling how she presents herself to the world |
Petruchio's soliloquy in 4.1 makes his strategy explicit:
"My falcon now is sharp and passing empty,
And till she stoop she must not be full-gorged,
For then she never looks upon her lure." (4.1.177–79)
The metaphor reduces Katherine to an animal to be trained. The verb "stoop" — a technical falconry term meaning to fly toward the lure — makes submission Katherine's destiny.
AO5 — Critical Interpretations: Modern critics are deeply divided. Germaine Greer reads the play as exposing patriarchal violence, arguing that Shakespeare makes the "taming" disturbing rather than comic. Harold Bloom suggests that Katherine and Petruchio are genuine intellectual equals whose verbal combat constitutes a form of courtship. Laurie Maguire argues that the play's Induction — in which Christopher Sly is also "tamed" by being told he is someone other than who he is — frames the entire action as a meditation on identity and performance.
Leontes' jealousy is unique in Shakespeare because it appears to have no external cause. Unlike Othello, who is manipulated by Iago, Leontes generates his jealousy internally, without evidence and without a tempter.
Leontes' jealousy erupts suddenly and violently:
"Too hot, too hot!
To mingle friendship far is mingling bloods." (1.2.110–11)
The language is characteristic: sexually charged, imagistically violent, syntactically fractured. Leontes' jealousy expresses itself through:
Leontes' jealousy is inseparable from his political power. As king, he can act on his suspicions without restraint:
"Is this nothing?
Why then the world and all that's in't is nothing,
The covering sky is nothing, Bohemia nothing,
My wife is nothing, nor nothing have these nothings,
If this be nothing." (1.2.294–98)
The cascading repetition of "nothing" is one of Shakespeare's most extraordinary speeches. Leontes' logic is circular and self-consuming: if his suspicion is wrong, then everything — the world, his kingdom, his wife — is meaningless. The word "nothing" itself echoes the Elizabethan slang for female genitalia ("no-thing"), layering sexual obsession into the philosophical crisis.
AO3 — Context: James I's court was characterised by intense personal relationships between the king and male favourites (notably Robert Carr and George Villiers). The Winter's Tale (c.1611) was written in this context, and the intense language of male friendship between Leontes and Polixenes — "We were as twinned lambs that did frisk i'th'sun" (1.2.69) — resonates with Jacobean anxieties about the boundaries between friendship and desire.
Angelo's desire for Isabella is presented not as love but as the corruption of authority by lust. His proposition — sleep with me or your brother dies — is a naked exercise of sexual power:
"Plainly conceive: I love you." (2.4.141)
The word "love" here is debased. Angelo uses it to mean sexual desire backed by political coercion. Isabella's response is devastating:
"Sign me a present pardon for my brother,
Or with an outstretched throat I'll tell the world aloud
What man thou art." (2.4.151–53)
The threatened reversal — making the judge's private corruption as public as the prisoner's punishment — is the play's central moral insight.
Angelo's control differs from Petruchio's or Leontes' because it operates through institutional authority:
| Form of Control | Agent | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic domination | Petruchio | Marriage as framework for the subjugation of one partner |
| Royal tyranny | Leontes | Absolute political power weaponised by sexual jealousy |
| Legal coercion | Angelo | The law itself becomes an instrument of sexual exploitation |
| Military reputation | Othello | Othello's authority depends on his public honour, making private betrayal existentially threatening |
Exam Tip: When writing about jealousy and control, always consider the structures of power that enable or constrain the characters. Shakespeare is not simply exploring individual psychology — he is examining how social, legal, and political systems create the conditions in which love becomes destructive.
| Play | Consequence | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Othello | Desdemona murdered; Othello suicides; Iago arrested | Jealousy destroys the innocent and the guilty alike; love and death become inseparable |
| The Taming of the Shrew | Katherine publicly declares submission | The "happy ending" is deeply ambiguous — is this genuine transformation, defeated compliance, or ironic performance? |
| Measure for Measure | Angelo exposed; forced to marry Mariana | The Duke's "justice" is itself a form of control — the play ends with four forced or coerced marriages |
| The Winter's Tale | Mamillius dies; Hermione "dies" (is concealed for sixteen years); Perdita is abandoned | Jealousy costs Leontes everything — but the play's romance structure allows partial, qualified restoration |
The strongest analytical responses will connect jealousy and control back to the theme of love, rather than treating them as separate topics:
Iago's masterstroke is to warn Othello against the very emotion he is inducing:
"O, beware, my lord, of jealousy;
It is the green-eyed monster which doth mock
The meat it feeds on." (Othello, 3.3.165–67)
The rhetorical cunning is exquisite. By naming jealousy and counselling against it, Iago appears to be Othello's protector — and simultaneously plants the word, the idea, the image. The metaphor itself is doing covert work. The "green-eyed monster" is a creature that "doth mock / The meat it feeds on": jealousy is figured as a predator that toys with its prey even as it devours it. This is, in fact, a precise description of Iago's relationship to Othello — Iago is the monster who mocks the man he is consuming — so the line is grimly self-referential, a confession disguised as a caution. The verb "mock" carries the sense of both deriding and counterfeiting, hinting that jealousy produces a false image of reality (Desdemona's guilt) that the sufferer then feeds on. Note, too, the form: this is fluent, image-rich verse — Iago at his most poetically commanding — which is itself part of the seduction. The man destroying Othello speaks the most memorable poetry in the scene. A candidate who can show that Iago's style is part of his weapon — that the beauty of the verse is complicit in the cruelty of the plot — is operating at the top of the AO2 range.
This connects directly to the play's most debated critical crux. If Iago must work this hard, with such artistry, to induce jealousy, is Othello "not easily jealous" (as his own epitaph claims) or is the ground already prepared? Bradley says Iago is a near-irresistible force acting on a noble nature; Leavis says the speed of Othello's collapse betrays a pre-existing flaw. The "green-eyed monster" speech is the hinge: it shows jealousy being manufactured, which supports Bradley — yet how quickly the manufacture succeeds may support Leavis. The same lines feed both readings.
Exam Tip: With Iago, always analyse the gap between what a speech appears to do and what it actually does. His language is at its most dangerous when it sounds most like care, counsel, or honesty. The label "honest Iago," repeated throughout the play, is the supreme dramatic irony.
One of the most analytically rewarding threads in Othello is the play's obsession with evidence — with the demand for proof and the manufacture of it. Othello's tragedy is, in one light, an epistemological disaster: a crisis about how we can know anything about another person's inner life.
As jealousy takes hold, Othello demands certainty: he insists on "ocular proof" (3.3.363) — visible, physical evidence of Desdemona's guilt. The phrase is revealing. "Ocular" means of the eye; Othello wants to see betrayal, as though love and fidelity were the kind of things that could be witnessed. But of course they cannot — fidelity is precisely what cannot be seen — and so Othello's demand for visible proof makes him vulnerable to Iago, who can supply the appearance of evidence (the handkerchief, Cassio's gestures, a reported dream) without any reality behind it. The desperate desire for certainty is what destroys certainty. Iago understands that a mind tormented by doubt will seize on any "proof" that ends the torment, even — especially — a false one.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.