You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Cartesian form a+bi is perfect for adding complex numbers, but clumsy for multiplying, dividing and taking powers. Polar (modulus–argument) form fixes this by describing z with two numbers — how far it is from the origin (the modulus r=∣z∣) and which direction it points (the argument θ=argz). In this language multiplication becomes "multiply the lengths, add the angles," which is the gateway to De Moivre's theorem, nth roots and the exponential form reiθ. Think of it as switching from "rectangular coordinates" (real and imaginary parts) to "polar coordinates" (radius and angle) for the same point on the Argand diagram — exactly the change of viewpoint you met for plane curves in A-Level Maths, now applied to complex numbers.
This is compulsory pure content for Papers 1 & 2, and the pivot of the whole strand. It is strongly AO1 (compute ∣z∣ and argz, convert both ways) with crucial AO2 (choose the correct quadrant, work within the principal range, justify the modulus/argument rules). Mastery here is the prerequisite for multiplication/division in polar form, De Moivre's theorem, roots of unity and the exponential form — every one of those topics is stated in terms of r and θ.
The modulus of z=a+bi is its distance from the origin on the Argand diagram — the length of the position vector to the point (a,b). By Pythagoras,
∣z∣=a2+b2.
It generalises the absolute value of a real number: for real z=a, ∣z∣=a2=∣a∣, the usual "distance from 0." The modulus is always a non-negative real number, even though z itself is complex. Because it measures distance, the modulus is the quantity you use whenever a question asks "how far," "how big," or "the length of" — and, crucially, it is the only sense in which one complex number can be meaningfully compared in size with another (via their moduli).
| z | ∣z∣ | |---|---| | 3+4i | 9+16=5 | | −5+12i | 25+144=13 | | 1−i | 2 | | 7 | 7 | | −3i | 3 |
It satisfies the key algebraic properties (all provable from ∣z∣2=zzˉ):
| Property | Formula |
|---|---|
| Non-negativity | $ |
| Conjugate | $ |
| Modulus squared | $ |
| Product | $ |
| Quotient | $\left |
| Triangle inequality | $ |
The product rule has a clean one-line proof using ∣z∣2=zzˉ and z1z2=zˉ1zˉ2:
∣z1z2∣2=(z1z2)(z1z2)=z1z2zˉ1zˉ2=(z1zˉ1)(z2zˉ2)=∣z1∣2∣z2∣2,
and taking (positive) square roots gives ∣z1z2∣=∣z1∣∣z2∣. The quotient rule follows by applying this to z1=z2z1⋅z2. These multiplicative properties are what make polar form so efficient for products and powers.
For z=0, the argument argz=θ is the angle the position vector makes with the positive real axis, measured anticlockwise. It is defined only up to multiples of 2π; the principal argument is the unique value in
−π<θ≤π.
To find it, compute the acute reference angle α=arctan∣a∣∣b∣ and then place it in the correct quadrant — never just type arctan(b/a) into a calculator, which only ever returns answers in (−2π,2π) and so gets quadrants 2 and 3 wrong.
| Quadrant of (a,b) | argz |
|---|---|
| 1st (a>0,b>0) | α |
| 2nd (a<0,b>0) | π−α |
| 3rd (a<0,b<0) | α−π |
| 4th (a>0,b<0) | −α |
Axis cases: arg(r)=0, arg(−r)=π (for r>0); arg(ki)=2π, arg(−ki)=−2π (for k>0). The argument of 0 is undefined — the zero vector has no direction.
The exact-angle values you will need most often come from the standard triangles; it is worth having them at your fingertips:
| Reference angle α | tanα | typical a+bi |
|---|---|---|
| 6π | 31 | 3+i |
| 4π | 1 | 1+i |
| 3π | 3 | 1+3i |
Recognising, say, that b/a=3 instantly gives a reference angle of 3π saves time and avoids calculator-rounding. For non-standard ratios you will of course use arctan and quote a decimal (in radians) to the required accuracy.
The diagram shows z=1+3i: modulus r=2 (the length of the position vector) and argument θ=3π (the angle from the positive real axis), with the right triangle of sides a=1, b=3.
Reading the right triangle gives a=rcosθ and b=rsinθ, so every non-zero z can be written
z=r(cosθ+isinθ),r=∣z∣, θ=argz.
Cartesian → polar: find r=a2+b2, then θ by the quadrant method. Polar → Cartesian: evaluate a=rcosθ, b=rsinθ.
There is an even more compact notation, exponential (Euler) form, which you will study fully alongside De Moivre's theorem:
z=reiθ,where eiθ=cosθ+isinθ.
In this form the multiplicative rules become the ordinary index laws: r1eiθ1⋅r2eiθ2=r1r2ei(θ1+θ2) and (reiθ)n=rneinθ. It is the same modulus–argument information written more economically — worth meeting now so that "multiply moduli, add arguments" feels inevitable rather than arbitrary.
The argument obeys multiplicative rules that make polar form so powerful:
| Property | Formula |
|---|---|
| Product | arg(z1z2)=argz1+argz2 |
| Quotient | arg(z2z1)=argz1−argz2 |
| Conjugate | arg(zˉ)=−argz |
| Negative | arg(−z)=argz±π |
Combined with ∣z1z2∣=∣z1∣∣z2∣: multiply moduli, add arguments (and divide moduli, subtract arguments) — adjusting by ±2π if needed to land in the principal range.
The "add arguments" rule is not magic — it is the angle-addition formulae in disguise. Writing z1=r1(cosθ1+isinθ1) and z2=r2(cosθ2+isinθ2) and multiplying out,
z1z2=r1r2[(cosθ1cosθ2−sinθ1sinθ2)+i(sinθ1cosθ2+cosθ1sinθ2)]=r1r2[cos(θ1+θ2)+isin(θ1+θ2)],
using cos(A+B) and sin(A+B). So the product has modulus r1r2 and argument θ1+θ2 — moduli multiply, arguments add. (This is the seed of De Moivre's theorem, where repeating the rule n times gives zn=rn(cosnθ+isinnθ).)
Find ∣z∣ and argz for z=1+3i.
∣z∣=1+3=2.(M1 A1) a,b>0⇒1st quadrant;α=arctan13=3π=argz.(M1 quadrant, A1)
(M1/A1 modulus; M1 for identifying the quadrant; A1 for 3π.)
Find ∣z∣ and argz for z=−3−3i.
∣z∣=9+9=32.(A1) a,b<0⇒3rd quadrant;α=arctan33=4π;argz=α−π=−43π.(M1 A1)
(M1 for the quadrant adjustment; A1 for −43π — note it is negative, in (−π,0), not 45π.)
Express z=−1+i in modulus–argument form.
r=1+1=2;a<0,b>0⇒2nd quadrant,α=4π,θ=π−4π=43π. z=2(cos43π+isin43π).(M1 r; M1 θ; A1 form)
Find ∣z∣ and argz for z=3−i.
∣z∣=3+1=2.(A1) a>0,b<0⇒4th quadrant;α=arctan31=6π;argz=−α=−6π.(M1 A1)
(M1 for the fourth-quadrant adjustment; A1 for −6π. In the fourth quadrant the principal argument is simply −α — negative, but already in (−π,π].)
Write z=4(cos32π+isin32π) in the form a+bi.
a=4cos32π=4⋅(−21)=−2,b=4sin32π=4⋅23=23. ∴z=−2+23i.(M1 exact values; A1)
(M1 for the exact values of cos32π and sin32π; A1 for the Cartesian form. Check: ∣z∣=4+12=4 ✓, recovering the modulus.)
(specimen-style — not from any past paper)
Given z=2(cos6π+isin6π) and w=3(cos4π+isin4π), express zw and wz in modulus–argument form.
Multiply moduli, add arguments:
∣zw∣=6,arg(zw)=6π+4π=122π+3π=125π, zw=6(cos125π+isin125π).
Divide moduli, subtract arguments:
wz=32,argwz=6π−4π=−12π, wz=32(cos(−12π)+isin(−12π)).
Both arguments already lie in (−π,π], so no adjustment is needed.
(continued) Hence write z2 in modulus–argument form.
Squaring multiplies the modulus by itself and doubles the argument:
∣z2∣=22=4,arg(z2)=2×6π=3π, z2=4(cos3π+isin3π).
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.