You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Cartesian arithmetic is dependable but blind: (a+bi)(c+di) tells you the answer without telling you what happened. Polar form makes the geometry visible. The single most important fact in this lesson is that multiplying complex numbers multiplies their moduli and adds their arguments, while dividing divides the moduli and subtracts the arguments. From those two rules, powers, rotations and the whole machinery of De Moivre's theorem follow. Once you see complex multiplication as "scale and turn," a calculation that would take a page of bracket-expansion becomes a line of mental arithmetic — and the picture of what the answer means comes free.
This is compulsory pure content for Papers 1 & 2, sitting between modulus–argument form (the previous lesson) and De Moivre's theorem (two lessons on). It is a blend of AO1 (apply the multiply-moduli / add-arguments rules accurately) and AO2 (interpret multiplication geometrically as a spiral similarity, and justify why the rules hold via the compound-angle formulae). It is also a quiet AO3 workhorse: rotation-by-multiplication is the cleanest way to handle "rotate this point/triangle about the origin" problems, which appear in transformation-geometry and vector contexts across the paper. Master the geometric picture here and De Moivre will feel like a restatement of something you already know.
Write two complex numbers in modulus–argument (polar) form:
z1=r1(cosθ1+isinθ1),z2=r2(cosθ2+isinθ2).
The product is
z1z2=r1r2(cos(θ1+θ2)+isin(θ1+θ2)).
This is not an axiom — it is forced by the compound-angle formulae you met in A-Level Maths. Multiply out and group:
z1z2=r1r2(cosθ1+isinθ1)(cosθ2+isinθ2)=r1r2[cosθ1cosθ2+icosθ1sinθ2+isinθ1cosθ2+i2sinθ1sinθ2]=r1r2[(cosθ1cosθ2−sinθ1sinθ2)+i(sinθ1cosθ2+cosθ1sinθ2)]=r1r2[cos(θ1+θ2)+isin(θ1+θ2)],
using cos(A+B)=cosAcosB−sinAsinB and sin(A+B)=sinAcosB+cosAsinB. The real part of the bracket is the cosine addition formula and the imaginary part is the sine addition formula — which is exactly why arguments add. In modulus–argument shorthand this is the clean pair
∣z1z2∣=∣z1∣∣z2∣,arg(z1z2)=argz1+argz2(mod 2π).
Multiplying every point z by a fixed w=r(cosθ+isinθ) does two things at once:
A combined enlargement-and-rotation about a fixed point is called a spiral similarity (or rotational enlargement). The special case ∣w∣=1 is a pure rotation: multiplying by cosθ+isinθ turns the plane by θ without changing any distance. This is the mechanism behind "multiplication by i is a quarter-turn," developed below. The other special case, argw=0 (so w is a positive real), is a pure enlargement by the factor w. Every complex multiplication is one of these or a blend of the two — which is the single most useful mental picture in the whole strand.
Dividing reverses multiplication, so moduli divide and arguments subtract:
z2z1=r2r1(cos(θ1−θ2)+isin(θ1−θ2)),(z2=0).
z2z1=∣z2∣∣z1∣,arg(z2z1)=argz1−argz2(mod 2π).
One quick way to see this: the reciprocal of z2=r2(cosθ2+isinθ2) is z2−1=r21(cos(−θ2)+isin(−θ2)) — reciprocate the modulus, negate the argument — and then z1/z2=z1⋅z2−1 applies the multiplication rule. (This also shows why the division rule is not a separate fact to memorise: it is the multiplication rule applied to z1 and z2−1.) After any such calculation, bring the argument back into the principal range (−π,π] by adding or subtracting 2π as needed; an answer of arg=67π should be reported as −65π. The polar approach is dramatically faster than Cartesian division (realising the denominator) whenever the moduli and arguments are known — compare one subtraction of angles against a full conjugate-multiplication and you can see why the exam rewards spotting when to convert.
Applying the multiplication rule with z1=z2=z gives z2=r2(cos2θ+isin2θ); repeating,
zn=rn(cosnθ+isinnθ).
This is De Moivre's theorem (proved formally two lessons on); for now it is just the multiplication rule used n times, and it already lets us compute powers that would be brutal by binomial expansion.
| Operation | Modulus | Argument |
|---|---|---|
| z1z2 | r1r2 (multiply) | θ1+θ2 (add) |
| z1/z2 | r1/r2 (divide) | θ1−θ2 (subtract) |
| zn | rn | nθ |
| 1/z | 1/r | −θ |
Given z1=2(cos3π+isin3π) and z2=3(cos6π+isin6π), find z1z2 in the form a+bi.
∣z1z2∣=2×3=6,arg(z1z2)=3π+6π=2π.(M1 multiply moduli, add args) z1z2=6(cos2π+isin2π)=6(0+i⋅1)=6i.(A1)
(M1 for the two rules applied together; A1 for 6i. Note how the answer drops out with no bracket-expansion at all.)
For the same z1,z2, find z2z1 in the form a+bi.
z2z1=32,arg(z2z1)=3π−6π=6π.(M1 divide moduli, subtract args) z2z1=32(cos6π+isin6π)=32(23+21i)=33+31i.(A1)
(M1 for the division rule; A1 for the exact Cartesian form. Equivalently 33=31 — leave surds rationalised.)
Find the modulus and argument of (1+i)6, and hence write it as a+bi.
First convert the base: ∣1+i∣=12+12=2 and arg(1+i)=4π (first quadrant). Then
(1+i)6=(2)6(cos46π+isin46π).(M1 convert base; M1 apply zn=rncisnθ)
Now (2)6=23=8 and 46π=23π, so
(1+i)6=8(cos23π+isin23π)=8(0−i)=−8i.(A1)
So ∣(1+i)6∣=8 and arg=23π≡−2π in principal range. (Check by Cartesian: (1+i)2=2i, so (1+i)6=(2i)3=8i3=−8i ✓.)
Compute (1+3i)3.
∣1+3i∣=1+3=2,arg=arctan13=3π.(M1 modulus and argument) (1+3i)3=23(cosπ+isinπ)=8(−1+0)=−8.(A1)
(M1 for the polar form of the base; A1 for −8. The answer is a negative real — a useful sanity flag, since 3θ=π lands on the negative real axis.)
The triangle with vertices z1=1, z2=2+i, z3=i is rotated 90∘ anticlockwise about the origin. Find the image vertices.
A 90∘ anticlockwise rotation about O is multiplication by cos2π+isin2π=i. Multiply each vertex:
z1′=i(1)=i;z2′=i(2+i)=2i+i2=−1+2i;z3′=i(i)=i2=−1.(M1 multiply each by i; A1 all three)
So the image triangle has vertices i, −1+2i and −1. (M1 identifying the rotation as ×i; A1 for the three correct images. A rotation preserves side lengths — a quick check is that ∣z2−z1∣=∣z2′−z1′∣.)
Find (3−i)(1+i) by first converting each factor to polar form, and give the answer in the form a+bi.
Convert each factor. 3−i: modulus 3+1=2, fourth-quadrant argument −6π. 1+i: modulus 2, argument 4π. (M1 both polar forms.) Multiply (moduli multiply, arguments add):
(3−i)(1+i)=22(cos(−6π+4π)+isin(−6π+4π))=22(cos12π+isin12π).(M1 multiply)
Since −6π+4π=12−2π+3π=12π, the modulus is 22 and the argument 12π. (A1.) As a Cartesian check, multiplying directly: (3−i)(1+i)=3+3i−i−i2=(3+1)+(3−1)i — and indeed 22cos12π=3+1 and 22sin12π=3−1, giving the exact value of cos12π as a by-product. (M1 both polar forms; M1 multiply; A1 modulus–argument answer. This neat side-effect — polar multiplication producing exact values of cos12π, sin12π — is a favourite exam twist.)
Find 2(cos65π+isin65π)8(cos43π+isin43π), giving the argument in (−π,π].
Moduli divide, arguments subtract:
modulus=28=4,argument=43π−65π=129π−10π=−12π.(M1 divide and subtract)
This already lies in (−π,π], so the quotient is 4(cos(−12π)+isin(−12π)). (M1 division rule; A1 with the principal argument. Had the subtraction strayed below −π, we would add 2π; here no adjustment is needed.)
(specimen-style — not from any past paper)
The complex numbers z1 and z2 satisfy ∣z1∣=4, argz1=32π, ∣z2∣=2 and argz2=−4π. (a) Find ∣z1z2∣ and arg(z1z2). (b) Find z2z1 and arg(z2z1), giving the argument in the range (−π,π].
(a) Moduli multiply, arguments add:
∣z1z2∣=4×2=8,arg(z1z2)=32π+(−4π)=128π−3π=125π.
This already lies in (−π,π], so no adjustment is needed.
(b) Moduli divide, arguments subtract:
z2z1=24=2,arg(z2z1)=32π−(−4π)=128π+3π=1211π.
Again 1211π≤π, so it is already the principal argument. (Had the subtraction given, say, 1213π, we would subtract 2π to report −1211π.)
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.