You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
When Elizabeth I came to the throne on 17 November 1558, England's religious identity was dangerously unsettled. In a single decade the country had been wrenched from the conservative Catholicism-without-the-Pope of Henry VIII's final years, to the assertive Protestantism of Edward VI, to the restored Roman Catholicism of Mary I — each transition enforced by statute and, under Mary, by fire. Religion was not a private matter of conscience but the foundation of public order, national loyalty, and international alignment in an age of confessional war. Elizabeth's task was to construct a settlement that could command outward obedience from a divided realm, secure her own supremacy, and avoid both Catholic resistance at home and a Catholic crusade from abroad.
Her answer — the Religious Settlement of 1559 — was among the most consequential and durable achievements of the Tudor century. It created a Church of England that was broadly Protestant in doctrine yet retained much that looked Catholic in structure and ceremony (bishops, vestments, the liturgical calendar) — the celebrated via media or "middle way." Its genius, and its fragility, lay in studied ambiguity: by leaving key points (above all the nature of the Eucharist) deliberately open, it could accommodate a wide spectrum of belief. But that same ambiguity guaranteed that the Settlement would be pressed from both flanks throughout the reign — by Catholics who could not accept it and by Puritans who found it insufficiently reformed. The central historical debate is whether the Settlement was a coherent, principled via media designed by Elizabeth herself, or a messy political compromise forced on a more radically Protestant queen and Parliament by circumstance — and whether its survival was owed to royal firmness or to the self-restraint of those it failed to satisfy.
Key Question: Was the Elizabethan Settlement a deliberately moderate via media crafted by a cautious queen, or a more thoroughly Protestant settlement diluted by political necessity — and did it endure because of Elizabeth's statecraft, or because Catholics and Puritans alike chose, for their own reasons, to conform?
This lesson belongs to Paper 1 (Breadth), Option 1C, in Part Two ("England: turmoil and triumph, 1547–1603"). The religious settlement and its challengers are among the most heavily examined Elizabethan topics.
The core of the Settlement consisted of two Acts of Parliament — the Act of Supremacy and the Act of Uniformity — and a body of Royal Injunctions. The legislation passed only after a parliamentary struggle in the spring of 1559, the interpretation of which (see AO3 below) is itself a major debate.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Royal title | Elizabeth was styled Supreme Governor of the Church of England — not "Supreme Head" as Henry and Edward had been. The change conciliated both those who held that no woman could be "head" of the Church and Protestants uneasy with so spiritual a title for a layperson |
| Oath of Supremacy | Clergy, judges, and officials had to swear acceptance of the queen's supremacy; refusal meant loss of office |
| Graduated penalties | First refusal: loss of office; second: praemunire (forfeiture of goods); third: treason (death) — though enforcement was, at first, deliberately mild |
| Repeal of the heresy laws | Mary's heresy statutes were repealed and papal authority abolished, ending the burnings |
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Book of Common Prayer | Imposed a revised Prayer Book, based on the more Protestant 1552 book but altered to soften its edges (the Black Rubric of 1552, denying the real presence, was dropped) |
| Communion words | Crucially, the words of administration fused the 1549 and 1552 formulae, so the communicant could understand the rite as conveying the body of Christ (Catholic/Lutheran) or as a memorial (Reformed) — the central act of constructive ambiguity |
| Compulsory attendance | All were required to attend their parish church on Sundays and holy days; absence incurred a fine of twelve pence per Sunday (the origin of recusancy fines) |
| The "Ornaments Rubric" | Required clergy to wear the traditional vestments in use in 1549 — a conservative provision that would ignite the Vestments Controversy |
| Injunction | Detail |
|---|---|
| English Bible | Every parish church to hold an English Bible (and Erasmus's Paraphrases) |
| Licensed preaching | Only licensed preachers might preach; the rest were to read the official Book of Homilies, controlling the pulpit against dissent |
| Images and the royal chapel | "Feigned" images were to be removed — yet Elizabeth retained a crucifix and candles in her own Chapel Royal, a personal conservatism that scandalised committed Protestants |
| Resident clergy | The clergy were to reside in their parishes and to be of good life |
| Music | English congregational singing was encouraged, but Elizabeth permitted the survival of elaborate choral music in cathedrals and the Chapel Royal |
Key Definition: Via media ("middle way") denotes the Settlement's positioning between Rome and Geneva — Protestant in theology (rejecting the Pope, transubstantiation, and five of the seven sacraments) but Catholic in much of its external form (episcopacy, vestments, set liturgy, the church year). Whether this "middle way" was a coherent theological vision or a pragmatic political compromise is precisely the historiographical question.
Exam Tip: The Settlement's masterstroke was constructive ambiguity, nowhere clearer than in the communion words: a conservative could believe he received Christ's body; a Protestant could take it as a memorial. This vagueness bought outward conformity — but, as with the Henrician compromises, it deferred rather than resolved conflict, leaving the Settlement permanently exposed to demands for clarification from both Catholics and Puritans.
The doctrinal substance of the Church was defined in the Thirty-Nine Articles, agreed by Convocation in 1563 and given statutory force in 1571. They are markedly Protestant in content — which is itself evidence against any reading of the Settlement as crypto-Catholic.
| Key Doctrine | Position |
|---|---|
| Scripture | Holy Scripture contains all things necessary to salvation — the Protestant principle of biblical authority |
| Justification | Salvation by faith alone (Article 11) — the cornerstone Reformation doctrine |
| Sacraments | Only two sacraments of the Gospel — baptism and the Lord's Supper (Article 25) — against the Catholic seven |
| The Eucharist | Transubstantiation is "repugnant to the plain words of Scripture" (Article 28), yet a spiritual presence to the faithful is affirmed — Reformed, but worded to avoid needless provocation |
| Predestination | Article 17 articulates predestination in carefully Reformed (broadly Calvinist) terms, without forcing the harshest conclusions |
| Church authority | The Church may decree rites and ceremonies but may not require as necessary to salvation anything not read in Scripture (Article 20) — the basis of Elizabeth's claim that ceremonies were adiaphora, things indifferent, within her authority to command |
A settlement on paper was not a settlement in the parishes. Its enforcement was deliberately gradual in the early years and reveals much about Elizabeth's priorities.
| Instrument | Detail |
|---|---|
| The episcopal bench | The Marian bishops almost all refused the oath and were deprived (1559–60); Elizabeth had to construct a new bench, headed by Matthew Parker as Archbishop of Canterbury (1559) — moderate men, many returned Marian exiles, on whom enforcement depended |
| Visitations | Royal visitors toured the dioceses in 1559 to administer the oath, remove images, and impose conformity — but enforcement of attendance was at first light, to avoid driving conservatives into open recusancy |
| The "Catholic survival" of the early years | For roughly the first decade, many conservative parishioners conformed outwardly while retaining old beliefs; the regime tolerated this "church papistry" rather than provoke confrontation, hoping the old faith would wither with the old generation |
| The hardening after 1570 | The papal bull, the Northern Rebellion, and the missionary priests ended this tolerance; from the 1570s enforcement became systematic and the penal laws savage |
This gradualism is itself an argument in the historiographical debate: Elizabeth's willingness to wait — to secure outward conformity now and trust to time for inward conversion — fits Christopher Haigh's picture of a slow Reformation far better than any model of rapid, enthusiastic Protestantisation. The Settlement succeeded, on this reading, less because it converted the country quickly than because it endured long enough for a Protestant generation to grow up within it.
Key Definition: Church papistry describes the widespread early-Elizabethan practice of outward conformity (attending the parish church to avoid the fine) combined with private retention of Catholic belief and, where possible, secret access to the Mass. It blurred the neat line between "Protestant" and "Catholic," and its existence is central to the debate about how Protestant England really was by 1603.
Despite the Settlement's comprehensiveness, it faced sustained challenge from Catholics — and the character of that challenge changed sharply over the reign, hardening after 1570.
In 1570 Pope Pius V issued the bull Regnans in Excelsis, excommunicating Elizabeth, declaring her deposed, and absolving her subjects of their allegiance. This transformed the Catholic question: it made loyalty to the old faith potentially synonymous with treason and supplied the pretext for ever-harsher penal laws. Before 1570 the regime could treat conformity leniently; after it, every Catholic was, in the regime's eyes, a potential traitor.
| Threat | Detail |
|---|---|
| William Allen's seminary at Douai (1568) | Trained exiled Englishmen as missionary priests to return and sustain Catholic worship; by 1580 around 100 seminary priests were active in England |
| The Jesuit mission (1580) | Edmund Campion and Robert Parsons led a high-profile Jesuit mission; Campion was captured, tried, and executed in 1581 (his Decem Rationes and "Brag" became Catholic touchstones); Parsons escaped to direct Catholic activity from abroad |
| Priest holes | Catholic gentry concealed missionary priests in hidden chambers, many constructed by the Jesuit lay brother Nicholas Owen |
| Penal laws | Steadily intensified: the recusancy fine was raised to a crushing £20 per month in 1581; an Act of 1585 made it treason for a seminary priest merely to be in England, and a felony to harbour one |
| Plot | Date | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Northern Rebellion | 1569 | The Catholic Earls of Northumberland and Westmorland rose to free Mary Queen of Scots and restore Catholicism; it collapsed, and around 700 were executed (analysed in Lesson 9) |
| Ridolfi Plot | 1571 | A conspiracy linking the Duke of Norfolk, Mary, the Pope, and Spain; its exposure led to Norfolk's execution (1572) |
| Throckmorton Plot | 1583 | A scheme for a Spanish-backed invasion coordinated with English Catholics, uncovered by Walsingham |
| Babington Plot | 1586 | A plot to assassinate Elizabeth and free Mary; Walsingham's interception of Mary's incriminating correspondence sealed her execution in 1587 |
Key Definition: Recusancy was the refusal to attend Church of England services. Recusants were overwhelmingly Catholics who maintained their faith under legal penalty. John Bossy influentially distinguished between a Catholicism of survival — quiet, seigneurial, household-based continuity of the old faith — and a Catholicism of mission (the Counter-Reformation priests) that sought actively to renew and, in its most political forms, to overthrow the Protestant state. This distinction is central to assessing how real the "Catholic threat" was.
At the opposite pole, Puritans — "the hotter sort of Protestants" — pressed for the Settlement to be reformed further, purging it of its surviving "Catholic" elements.
| Issue | Puritan Position | Elizabeth's Position |
|---|---|---|
| Vestments | Condemned clerical vestments as "popish rags" and idolatrous survivals | Required by the Ornaments Rubric; a test of obedience |
| Church government | The more radical (Presbyterians) wished to abolish bishops in favour of governance by elected elders | Episcopacy was non-negotiable — bishops were the instrument of royal control over the Church ("no bishop, no king" logic) |
| Preaching | Demanded a learned, preaching ministry and more sermons | Wary of unlicensed preaching as a vector of dissent and sedition |
| Ceremonies | Wanted to abolish kneeling at communion, the sign of the cross in baptism, and the wedding ring as relics of popery | Held these to be adiaphora (things indifferent) that the supreme governor had every right to command |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.