You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson examines how superpowers exercise and maintain power through international governmental organisations (IGOs). You will analyse how the United Nations, IMF, World Bank, WTO, NATO and other institutions function as mechanisms of power, who controls them, and the growing debate about reform. This lesson addresses the Edexcel Enquiry Question: "What mechanisms are used to maintain superpower influence?"
An International Governmental Organisation (IGO) is an organisation composed of sovereign member states, established by treaty, with a permanent secretariat and decision-making structures. IGOs provide the institutional architecture of global governance — the rules, norms and mechanisms through which states cooperate (or compete) on issues that transcend national borders.
For the Superpowers topic, IGOs matter because:
Exam Tip: A key evaluative question for this topic is: do IGOs serve the interests of all member states equally, or are they instruments of superpower dominance? The best answers will argue that they are both — IGOs provide genuine benefits (stability, cooperation, rules-based order) but are also structured in ways that favour the most powerful states.
Founded in 1945 after World War II, the UN has 193 member states and is the most important IGO in the international system.
The UN Security Council is the most powerful body in the UN system. It has 15 members:
The P5 were the victorious powers of World War II, and their permanent membership reflects the power structure of 1945, not today. The veto gives each P5 member the ability to block any substantive Security Council resolution, regardless of the views of the other 14 members.
| P5 Member | Vetoes Used (1946–2024) | Notable Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Russia/USSR | ~130 | Blocking action on Syria (16 vetoes since 2011), protecting allies |
| USA | ~83 | Blocking resolutions critical of Israel (over 40 times since 1972) |
| UK | ~29 | Used frequently during decolonisation era |
| France | ~16 | Used mainly in early decades |
| China | ~18 | Used sparingly but increasing; blocked action on Myanmar, Syria |
The veto is the clearest mechanism through which superpowers maintain control over international security. It means that the Security Council can effectively never take action against a P5 member or its allies, creating a fundamental inequality in the international system.
There is widespread support for reforming the Security Council to reflect the current balance of power:
Exam Tip: Security Council reform is an excellent example to illustrate the argument that IGOs are designed to maintain the existing power structure. The veto gives P5 members an effective lock on reform — a classic case of "turkeys not voting for Christmas."
The IMF was established at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944 to promote international monetary cooperation and financial stability. It has 190 member states and is headquartered in Washington, D.C.
The IMF operates on a weighted voting system where economic power directly translates into institutional power:
| Country/Group | Voting Share (%) |
|---|---|
| USA | 16.5 |
| Japan | 6.1 |
| China | 6.1 |
| Germany | 5.3 |
| UK | 4.0 |
| France | 4.0 |
| USA + EU combined | ~43 |
| All of Sub-Saharan Africa | ~4.4 |
The USA holds a critical advantage: major IMF decisions require an 85% supermajority, and the USA alone holds over 16.5% of voting power — giving it an effective veto over any major decision.
From the 1980s, the IMF attached strict conditions to its loans, requiring borrowing countries to implement Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs):
SAPs have been highly controversial. Critics argue they imposed Western neoliberal ideology on developing countries, worsening poverty and inequality. The case of Zambia is frequently cited: SAPs in the 1990s required cuts to health and education spending, contributing to declining life expectancy and school enrolment. Joseph Stiglitz, former World Bank Chief Economist, described the IMF's approach as "market fundamentalism" that ignored the social costs of rapid liberalisation.
Defenders argue SAPs imposed necessary discipline on countries with unsustainable fiscal policies. The IMF has since reformed its approach, renaming SAPs as Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and emphasising "country ownership" — though critics argue the fundamental approach has not changed significantly.
graph LR
A["Country faces<br/>financial crisis"] --> B["Requests IMF<br/>emergency loan"]
B --> C["IMF imposes<br/>CONDITIONS<br/>(conditionality)"]
C --> D["Privatisation<br/>Deregulation<br/>Spending cuts<br/>Trade liberalisation"]
D --> E{"Outcome?"}
E --> F["Economic<br/>stabilisation<br/>(IMF view)"]
E --> G["Increased poverty<br/>and inequality<br/>(Critical view)"]
style C fill:#e65100,color:#fff
style F fill:#2e7d32,color:#fff
style G fill:#c62828,color:#fff
Also established at Bretton Woods (1944), the World Bank provides long-term development loans and grants to low- and middle-income countries. It is headquartered in Washington, D.C.
The World Bank Group comprises five institutions, the most important being:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.