You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The crisis of confidence that closed the 1970s did not end the American Dream; it transformed the terms on which the Dream would be pursued. The election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 marked the triumph of a conservative movement that had been building since Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964, and it answered the malaise of the previous decade with a bracing promise: that the Dream was not exhausted but merely mismanaged, that government was the problem rather than the solution, and that America's greatness could be restored. The years from 1980 to 1996 — Reagan's two terms, the single term of George H. W. Bush, and the first term of Bill Clinton — saw a decisive shift in the meaning of the American Dream, away from the New Deal and Great Society faith in an activist federal government and toward a renewed emphasis on individual enterprise, tax-cutting, deregulation and the market. Abroad, the same period saw the astonishing and largely peaceful end of the Cold War that had shaped American life since 1945. Yet the renewed Dream was as contested as any earlier version: its critics argued that supply-side prosperity widened inequality and abandoned the poor, so that the Dream was renewed for some and further deferred for others. This final chapter of the course brings the story of the American Dream to its close on a note of vigorous renewal and sharp division.
For this Edexcel breadth study the Reagan era is the resolution of the role of government thread that has run the length of the course: the New Deal settlement, dominant since the 1930s, is at last challenged by a conservative counter-revolution that reshapes the terms of American politics. It completes the economy thread with the supply-side boom and the inequality it produced; it advances the American people thread through the culture wars and the persistence of exclusion beneath the renewed prosperity; and it closes the American Dream thread itself with a contest over whether the Dream had been restored or merely repackaged. The analytical task is to weigh the reality of the conservative renewal — economically, politically and in the ending of the Cold War — against its limits and its costs, reaching a judgement about how far the Dream was genuinely renewed and for whom.
By the end of this lesson you will be able to:
This lesson belongs to Edexcel 9HI0 Paper 1, Option 1F (Route F): "In search of the American Dream: the USA, c1917-96" — a breadth study assessed by extended analytical essays and by the evaluation of historians' interpretations. Within our own teaching sequence it is the culmination of the whole course and the resolution of the role of government thread, answering the crisis of confidence of the 1970s (Lesson 8) with a conservative counter-revolution against the New Deal settlement established in the 1930s (Lesson 2), and bringing the American Dream theme to its close at the terminal date of 1996.
Because Paper 1 is a breadth paper, examiners reward command of change over time and judgements that range across the whole period. Keep asking how far the Dream was genuinely renewed in these years, and how the renewal compares with the earlier chapters of the course. (For precise assessment weightings and question wording, always consult the official Edexcel specification and sample assessment materials rather than any paraphrase.)
The conservative movement that carried Reagan to power in 1980 had deep roots. Its intellectual foundations had been laid over decades — in the free-market economics associated with thinkers such as Milton Friedman, in the revived case for limited government, and in Goldwater's insurgent (and crushingly defeated) campaign of 1964, examined in Lesson 6, which had nonetheless articulated the philosophy that would eventually triumph. Three currents converged. First, an economic conservatism that blamed stagflation on high taxes, heavy regulation and swollen government, and proposed to revive growth by unleashing private enterprise. Second, a social conservatism energised by the culture wars of the 1970s — reactions against the counterculture, feminism, the Roe v. Wade abortion decision of 1973 and the perceived decline of traditional values — which mobilised a newly political evangelical movement, the "New Right" and organisations associated with the "Moral Majority". Third, the resentments traced in the last two lessons: the "silent majority" alienated by protest and disorder, and the working-class and Southern white voters drifting away from the Democratic coalition that had held since the New Deal.
Ronald Reagan — a former film actor, General Electric spokesman and two-term governor of California — fused these currents with an unmatched gift for optimistic communication. Against Carter's talk of limits and malaise, Reagan offered a message of renewal: that America's best days lay ahead, that government was "the problem", and that the Dream could be reclaimed by cutting taxes, shrinking the state and restoring national strength. He won the 1980 election decisively, defeating Carter and carrying 44 states, and his victory swept a Republican majority into the Senate for the first time in a generation. For the American Dream, Reagan's election was a genuine turning point: it repudiated the half-century assumption, established in the New Deal and extended in the Great Society, that the federal government was the natural instrument of opportunity and security, and reasserted the older, pre-1933 conviction that the Dream was the achievement of free individuals in a free market. The wheel, in a sense, had come full circle to the philosophy of the 1920s examined in Lesson 1 — though now tested against, and defined in opposition to, the vast welfare state the intervening half-century had built.
At the heart of the conservative renewal was a new economic programme, "Reaganomics", grounded in supply-side economics — the theory that cutting taxes, especially on higher incomes and business, would stimulate investment, work and enterprise, expanding the economy so vigorously that revenue would ultimately rise. The programme had four pillars: substantial tax cuts (the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 cut income tax rates across the board); deregulation of industry and finance; restraint on the growth of domestic social spending; and a tight monetary policy against inflation, pursued by the Federal Reserve under Paul Volcker, whose high interest rates broke the back of inflation at the cost of a severe recession in 1981-82.
| Pillar of Reaganomics | Intended effect |
|---|---|
| Tax cuts (1981; further reform in 1986) | Unleash private investment, work and enterprise; revive the Dream of individual advancement |
| Deregulation | Free business from the regulatory burden blamed for stagflation |
| Spending restraint on domestic programmes | Shrink the activist state and the New Deal / Great Society inheritance |
| Tight money (the Volcker Federal Reserve) | Break the inflation that had eroded the post-war Dream of rising prosperity |
The results were real but double-edged, and the debate over them is the economic core of any judgement on the era. After the sharp recession of 1981-82, the economy entered a long expansion: inflation was tamed, growth resumed, and millions of jobs were created, restoring a sense of prosperity and possibility that the 1970s had destroyed. Reagan's landslide re-election in 1984 — carrying 49 of the 50 states against Walter Mondale — reflected a national mood of recovered confidence, captured in his campaign's evocation of "morning again in America". Yet the renewal had costs. The combination of tax cuts and a large military build-up, without matching spending reductions, produced enormous federal budget deficits and roughly trebled the national debt over the decade — an irony for a movement dedicated to limited government. And the prosperity was unevenly distributed: incomes at the top rose sharply while those in the middle and below stagnated, so that inequality widened markedly. For the American Dream, Reaganomics posed the defining question of the era's economics: it undeniably renewed the Dream of enterprise and restored growth and confidence, but it did so in a way that critics argued renewed the Dream most fully for those already prosperous, while the deindustrialisation of the 1970s continued to hollow out the blue-collar middle class that the post-war boom had created.
If domestic renewal was one half of the conservative promise, the restoration of American strength abroad was the other, and here the era's achievement was historic. Reagan came to office a fierce Cold War hawk, denouncing the Soviet Union and presiding over a vast military build-up intended to confront it from a position of strength; his first term was among the tensest of the whole Cold War. Yet from 1985 the emergence of a reforming Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, whose policies of internal reform and openness reflected the deep weakness of the Soviet system, opened the way to an extraordinary transformation. In a series of summits, Reagan and Gorbachev moved from confrontation to genuine arms reduction, agreeing in the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty of 1987 to eliminate a whole class of nuclear missiles. The pace of change then accelerated beyond anyone's expectation: in 1989 the communist regimes of Eastern Europe collapsed and the Berlin Wall fell; in 1991 the Soviet Union itself dissolved. The Cold War that had structured American life, and the American Dream's self-understanding as the defender of freedom, since 1945 was over, and the United States stood as the world's sole superpower.
The end of the Cold War is a genuinely contested achievement, and a mature judgement resists the simplest triumphalism. One reading credits Reagan's hard-line pressure and military build-up with forcing the Soviet collapse; another stresses the internal weaknesses and reform of the Soviet system, and Gorbachev's decisive choices, as the deeper cause. The most defensible position holds both together: American strength and Reagan's late-term willingness to negotiate mattered, but the Soviet system fell above all under the weight of its own contradictions. For the American Dream, however, the significance is clear either way. The peaceful end of the Cold War seemed to vindicate the American model — free markets and liberal democracy — on a world scale, and it restored the sense of national purpose and greatness that Vietnam and the malaise of the 1970s had shattered. This, as much as the economic recovery, was the "renewal" the conservative revival delivered: the Dream reconceived once more as a promise not only of personal prosperity but of national mission triumphant.
George H. W. Bush, Reagan's Vice-President, won the 1988 election as his chosen successor, and his single term (1989-93) presided over the climax of the Cold War's end. Abroad, Bush managed the collapse of Soviet power with restraint and assembled a broad international coalition to reverse Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in the Gulf War of 1991 — a swift, decisive victory that, for a moment, seemed to lay the "Vietnam syndrome" of the previous lessons to rest and to restore faith in American power. Yet at home Bush was undone by the very economics of the renewal. A recession in the early 1990s, and his decision to raise taxes in defiance of a famous campaign pledge not to, alienated the conservative base and exposed him to the charge that the prosperity of the 1980s had not reached everyone. The persistence of the deficit, and a sense that the renewed Dream had bypassed the struggling middle class, left him vulnerable.
It was into this opening that Bill Clinton stepped, winning the 1992 election. Clinton represented a Democratic Party remade by the conservative era: a "New Democrat" who accepted much of the Reagan settlement — fiscal discipline, welfare reform, a friendlier stance toward business and the market — while seeking to soften its hardest edges and to restore opportunity to the middle class whose anxieties Bush had neglected. The very fact that a Democrat governed by accommodating the conservative framework is itself the measure of how completely the Reagan revolution had reshaped the terms of American politics; the New Deal assumptions that had dominated from the 1930s to the 1970s no longer set the agenda. Clinton's first term saw a long economic expansion take hold, and by 1996 — the terminal date of the course — he was re-elected amid recovering prosperity, after a dramatic mid-term clash with a resurgent Republican Congress that had swept to power in 1994 on an anti-government platform. His 1996 declaration that "the era of big government is over" stands as a fitting endpoint: a Democratic president ratifying, in his own words, the conservative reconception of the role of government that the era had achieved. For the American Dream, the mid-1990s present a picture of vigorous but contested renewal — a nation restored to prosperity, confidence and global pre-eminence, yet marked by a widened inequality and a persistent underclass that testified, as every earlier chapter had, that the Dream remained real, powerful and unevenly shared.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.