You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 8 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
An analysis frame is a paragraph scaffold — a sequence of steps that together build a complete analytical paragraph. English teachers use different acronyms for essentially the same moves: PEE, PEEL, PEAL, PETER, "What–How–Why–So what?" Each is a slightly different weighting of the same core ingredients: a claim, some evidence, an explanation of what the evidence does, and a connection to a larger idea.
This lesson covers the main frames, shows how they differ, and — crucially — advises which frame to reach for in which exam question. Frames are not a straitjacket. They are a training wheel that you eventually internalise and outgrow. By the time you sit the exam, the frame should be invisible — the paragraph just flows. But while you're still learning, the frame is invaluable: it prevents you from forgetting the So what? that earns the top-band marks.
This lesson develops paragraph-level craft across AO1, AO2, AO3 and AO4 — essentially every reading and comparison AO on the 1EN0 spec.
The mark-scheme language at GCSE rewards developed, layered analysis. A paragraph that stops after Point + Evidence + one sentence of explanation is mid-band. A paragraph that extends through Effect → Reader → Link → Bigger idea is top-band.
Students forget the back half of the paragraph under exam pressure. They rush through evidence, explain briefly, and move on. A frame is a mental checklist that prevents this: have I done the effect? the reader? the link?
Before we compare, here are the basic acronyms spelled out.
| Frame | Stands for | Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| PEE | Point, Evidence, Explanation | Simplest; good for short-answer questions |
| PEEL | Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link | Adds a closing link back to the question |
| PEAL | Point, Evidence, Analysis, Link | Replaces Explanation with Analysis — deeper |
| PETER | Point, Evidence, Technique, Effect, Reader | Most popular for GCSE English Language |
| What–How–Why–So what? | Open scaffold, four questions | Best for top-band or open-ended questions |
All five are variations on the same set of ingredients. Think of them as different recipes using the same spices.
PEE (Point, Evidence, Explanation) is the simplest frame, and often the right frame for short, focused questions (like Paper 1 Q2 or Q3).
(P) The writer emphasises the child's isolation through the depiction of the physical space. (E) The narrator notes that "the corridor narrowed as she walked". (E) This suggests that the environment itself is closing in on her, making her seem trapped even before any character has spoken.
Three short moves. Clear. Competent. Middle-band. The limit of PEE is that the Explanation step often stops one sentence too early; there's no forced So what?
PEEL adds Link at the end — connecting the paragraph back to the question or to a bigger theme.
(P) The writer emphasises the child's isolation through the depiction of physical space. (E) The narrator notes that "the corridor narrowed as she walked". (E) This suggests the environment itself is closing in on her, making her seem trapped even before any character has spoken. (L) In this way, the writer establishes isolation as the central condition of the passage, preparing the reader for the human coldness that will come later.
The Link turns a local observation into a structural claim about the passage as a whole. This is the move that earns upper-band marks.
PEAL replaces Explanation with Analysis, which is semantically stronger: analysing implies unpacking, breaking down, evaluating, rather than merely describing.
(P) The writer emphasises the child's isolation through the depiction of physical space. (E) The narrator notes that "the corridor narrowed as she walked". (A) The verb "narrowed" is ambiguous: it may describe the corridor's actual shape, or it may describe the child's perception of it growing tighter with each step. This ambiguity implicates the reader in the child's psychology — we cannot tell where her fear ends and her environment begins. (L) By dissolving this boundary, the writer primes us to experience her isolation as environmental, not merely emotional.
The Analysis step goes beyond description: it notices a specific word (narrowed), opens the ambiguity in that word, and reads the effect on the reader's interpretive position. This is top-band work.
PETER is the frame most commonly recommended for Edexcel GCSE English Language. It extends PEE with Technique and Reader, making the analysis more specific and the effect more explicit.
(P) The writer makes the child's isolation feel environmental. (E) The narrator notes that "the corridor narrowed as she walked". (T) This is a use of personification — the corridor is given an agency of its own, as though actively contracting around her. (E) The effect is to make the space feel complicit in her exclusion, not simply a backdrop for it. (R) The reader, therefore, is prompted to feel unease on the child's behalf before any explicit threat has emerged — the setting itself has become hostile.
Five crisp moves. Each is one or two sentences. The result is a tight, layered paragraph that nails AO2 requirements: technique, evidence, effect, reader.
Why PETER works well for Edexcel: it directly mirrors the mark-scheme language ("perceptive response to writer's methods" means Technique; "critical evaluation" means Effect; Q5's statement about the reader's reaction maps onto Reader).
This is less a scaffold and more a set of four interrogations you apply to any passage. It's the frame top-band students use once they've outgrown the acronyms.
The final question is the killer. It forces you to conceptualise — to say something about the passage that survives beyond the local observation.
What: The passage describes a child walking alone through a narrowing corridor toward an empty coat-stand. How: The writer personifies the corridor ("narrowed as she walked"), uses short sentences at key moments, and ends on a declarative finality ("the empty coat-stand confirmed it"). Why: These choices combine to make the setting do the emotional work the narrator refuses to. So what: What emerges, in the absence of explicit characterisation of the child's feeling, is a story told entirely by environment — the reader is put in the position of learning the child's inner state from rooms, doors, and stands, rather than from the child herself. This is the extract's quiet moral: that in this world, a child's feelings go unnamed, and must be read off the architecture.
The So what conceptualises the passage into a reading — one of the exact moves the Level 4 mark scheme on Q4 and Q5 looks for.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 8 lessons in this course.