You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 12 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
In the FSCE 11+ exam, many questions will ask you to work out something that is not directly stated in the text. This skill is called inference. It is one of the most important skills you can develop, and it is tested heavily in the FSCE exam. Instead of just finding facts in the passage (retrieval), you need to read between the lines and use clues to work out what the author is really saying.
This lesson will teach you the difference between inference and deduction, give you a clear 5-step method for making inferences, and provide worked examples with detailed model answers.
These two words are often used together, but they mean slightly different things:
Example:
Tom slammed the door and threw his bag on the floor. He kicked off his shoes without untying them and stomped upstairs.
graph TD
A["Text Clues"] --> B["INFERENCE"]
A --> C["DEDUCTION"]
B --> D["Reading between the lines"]
B --> E["Using clues to guess feelings, motives, meaning"]
C --> F["Logical conclusion from facts"]
C --> G["Putting facts together to reach a certain answer"]
Follow these five steps whenever you need to make an inference:
Step 1: Read the question carefully. What exactly are you being asked to work out?
Step 2: Find the relevant section of the passage. Look for the part of the text that relates to the question.
Step 3: Identify the clues. What words, phrases, or details hint at the answer? Underline them.
Step 4: Think about what the clues suggest. What do these details tell you about the character's feelings, the situation, or the meaning?
Step 5: Write your answer using evidence. State your inference, quote the clues from the text, and explain what they suggest.
graph TD
A["Step 1: Read the question"] --> B["Step 2: Find the relevant section"]
B --> C["Step 3: Identify the clues"]
C --> D["Step 4: Think about what they suggest"]
D --> E["Step 5: Write your answer with evidence"]
Read the passage below:
Mrs Kapoor placed the letter carefully on the kitchen table and sat down. She stared at it for a long time without moving. Then she picked it up, read it once more, and folded it back into its envelope with slow, deliberate movements. She walked to the window and looked out at the garden, though she did not seem to see the flowers or the birds. When her daughter came in and asked what was for dinner, Mrs Kapoor smiled quickly and said, "Anything you like, love," before turning back to the window.
Question: How is Mrs Kapoor feeling? Use evidence from the text to support your answer.
Weak answer: "Mrs Kapoor is sad because she got a bad letter."
Strong answer: "Mrs Kapoor appears to be deeply upset or shocked by the letter she has received. Several clues suggest this. She 'stared at it for a long time without moving,' which shows she is stunned or struggling to process the news. She folds it back 'with slow, deliberate movements,' which suggests she is trying to stay calm and in control of her emotions. When she looks out of the window, she 'did not seem to see the flowers or the birds,' which tells us she is lost in thought and distracted by whatever the letter contained. Finally, when her daughter asks about dinner, she 'smiled quickly' -- the word 'quickly' suggests the smile is forced and not genuine, as though she is hiding her true feelings. All of these clues together suggest that Mrs Kapoor has received upsetting news and is trying to cope with it without worrying her daughter."
Why the strong answer is better: The weak answer makes a guess ("sad") and an assumption ("bad letter") without evidence. The strong answer identifies four separate clues, quotes each one, and explains what it suggests. It also notices the nuance -- Mrs Kapoor is not just sad but is trying to hide her feelings from her daughter.
Leo sat at one end of the bench and his brother Marcus sat at the other. The gap between them felt wider than the length of the bench. Leo glanced sideways at Marcus, but Marcus kept his eyes fixed on his phone, scrolling without stopping. Leo opened his mouth to speak, then closed it again. He pulled a sandwich from his bag and ate it in silence. After ten minutes, Marcus stood up without a word and walked away. Leo watched him go, then looked down at his hands.
Question: What can you infer about the relationship between Leo and Marcus?
Strong answer: "The passage suggests that Leo and Marcus have a strained or difficult relationship. They sit at opposite ends of the bench, and the narrator says 'the gap between them felt wider than the length of the bench,' which is a metaphor suggesting emotional distance, not just physical distance. Leo wants to communicate -- he 'glanced sideways at Marcus' and 'opened his mouth to speak' -- but cannot bring himself to say anything, which suggests he is nervous or unsure of how Marcus will react. Marcus, meanwhile, ignores Leo completely, keeping 'his eyes fixed on his phone' and leaving 'without a word.' This suggests Marcus is either angry with Leo or deliberately shutting him out. The fact that Leo 'watched him go, then looked down at his hands' implies sadness and helplessness. Overall, it seems like the brothers have had some kind of falling out, and Leo wants to repair the relationship but does not know how."
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 12 lessons in this course.