You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
There is no single cause of addiction — it is influenced by a combination of biological, psychological, and social factors. Understanding these different explanations is important for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.
Research suggests that genetic factors play a role in vulnerability to addiction:
| Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|
| Twin studies provide strong evidence for a genetic component | Genetics alone do not determine addiction — many people with genetic vulnerability never develop addiction |
| Specific genes have been identified (e.g. DRD2) | Environmental factors (upbringing, peer influence, stress) also play a crucial role |
| If addiction were purely genetic, identical twins would always both develop it — but concordance rates are not 100% |
The dopamine reward system plays a central role in addiction:
This creates a cycle where the person uses the substance not for enjoyment but to avoid withdrawal and relieve negative feelings.
| Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|
| Strongly supported by neuroscience research | Does not explain why some people who use addictive substances do not become addicted |
| Explains why tolerance and withdrawal develop | Oversimplifies addiction — psychological and social factors are also important |
| Explains craving and compulsion |
Peers (friends, social groups) are a significant factor in the development of addiction, particularly in adolescence:
| Mechanism | Description |
|---|---|
| Social pressure | Direct pressure to try substances ("Go on, everyone's doing it") |
| Normative influence | If substance use is the norm in a social group, individuals are more likely to adopt it |
| Modelling | Observing peers using substances normalises the behaviour and provides a template for imitation |
| Availability | Being part of a group where substances are readily available increases exposure |
| Identity | Using substances may become part of the group identity |
| Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|
| Research consistently shows that peer substance use is one of the strongest predictors of an individual's substance use | Not everyone who is exposed to peer influence develops addiction — individual differences matter |
| Has practical implications — peer-focused interventions can help prevent addiction | It is difficult to establish cause and effect — do peers cause addiction, or do people who are predisposed to addiction seek out similar peers? (selection effects) |
Certain personality traits may make some people more vulnerable to addiction:
| Trait | Link to Addiction |
|---|---|
| Impulsivity | Acting without thinking about consequences; seeking immediate gratification |
| Sensation-seeking | Seeking novel, exciting, and intense experiences |
| Neuroticism | High anxiety and emotional instability; may use substances to cope |
| Low conscientiousness | Difficulty with self-discipline and following rules |
| Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|
| Research shows consistent links between certain personality traits and addiction risk | Personality traits do not guarantee addiction — many impulsive people never develop addiction |
| Could be used for early identification of at-risk individuals | Correlation vs causation — it is unclear whether personality causes addiction or whether addiction changes personality |
Most experts agree that addiction is best understood through the biopsychosocial model — it results from an interaction between:
No single factor alone causes addiction — it is the combination and interaction of these factors that determines whether a person develops an addiction.
Mark Griffiths has argued that addiction is best understood using the principles of operant conditioning — the idea that behaviour is shaped by its consequences:
Griffiths' model is particularly useful for behavioural addictions such as gambling and gaming, where there is no single "drug" but where intermittent rewards powerfully reinforce behaviour. It also integrates smoothly with biological accounts: operant learning provides the behavioural mechanism through which dopamine's reinforcing effects translate into habitual use.
flowchart TD
A[Initial use] --> B[Positive reinforcement: pleasure / dopamine]
B --> C[Repeated use]
C --> D[Tolerance and dependence]
D --> E[Withdrawal symptoms when stopping]
E --> F[Negative reinforcement: use to relieve withdrawal]
F --> C
C --> G[Cue-learning: places, people, smells]
G --> H[Cravings triggered by cues]
H --> C
Cognitive accounts focus on the beliefs and expectations that shape addictive behaviour:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.