Dispositional Explanations for Obedience

While Milgram emphasised situational factors in explaining obedience, other psychologists have argued that dispositional factors (personality traits and individual differences) also play an important role. The most influential dispositional explanation is Adorno's concept of the authoritarian personality.

---

The Authoritarian Personality

Adorno et al. (1950)

Theodor Adorno and his colleagues conducted research shortly after World War II, trying to understand the psychological factors behind the rise of fascism and the obedience shown by ordinary people during the Holocaust.

What is the Authoritarian Personality?

The authoritarian personality is a personality type characterised by:

• Extreme obedience to authority figures and contempt for those seen as inferior
• Rigid, inflexible thinking — intolerance of ambiguity and a preference for clear-cut rules
• Conventional values — strong adherence to traditional social norms
• Hostility towards out-groups — prejudice against people who are different (different ethnicity, religion, social class, etc.)
• Submission to in-group authority — uncritical acceptance of the authority of those perceived as superior

How Does It Develop?

Adorno proposed that the authoritarian personality develops from strict, harsh parenting in childhood:

1. Strict, punitive parents who use physical punishment and demand absolute obedience
2. The child develops hostility towards the parents but cannot express it (fear of punishment)
3. This hostility is displaced onto weaker targets (minority groups, people of lower status)
4. The child develops a rigid worldview with clear authority hierarchies — submitting to those above and dominating those below

---

flowchart TB
    P["Strict, punitive parents<br/>physical punishment<br/>demand obedience"] --> H["Child develops hostility<br/>towards parents"]
    H --> F["Cannot express hostility<br/>fear of punishment"]
    F --> D["Hostility DISPLACED<br/>onto weaker targets<br/>minorities, low-status"]
    D --> AP["AUTHORITARIAN PERSONALITY<br/>rigid thinking<br/>conventional values<br/>submission to authority<br/>hostility to out-groups"]
    AP --> OB["High obedience<br/>to legitimate authority"]
    AP --> FS["High score on F-scale<br/>Adorno et al. 1950"]

---

The F-Scale

Adorno developed the F-scale (Fascism scale) to measure authoritarian personality traits. Participants rated their agreement with statements such as:

• "Obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues children should learn"
• "What young people need most is strict discipline and the determination to work hard"
• "There is hardly anything lower than a person who does not feel great love and respect for their parents"

Higher scores on the F-scale indicate a stronger authoritarian personality.

---

Linking Authoritarian Personality to Obedience

Adorno's theory suggests that people with an authoritarian personality are more likely to obey authority figures because:

• They have been socialised to respect and submit to authority
• They view the world in terms of rigid hierarchies — those above them must be obeyed
• They do not question authority — they accept orders without critical evaluation
• They displace their frustrations onto weaker targets rather than challenging those in power

Milgram's Findings

After Milgram's study, participants were assessed on measures related to authoritarian personality. Participants who went to the highest shock levels tended to score higher on measures of authoritarianism than those who refused to obey.

---

Evaluation of the Authoritarian Personality

Strengths

• The concept provides a psychological explanation for extreme obedience (e.g. during the Holocaust)
• Supported by evidence showing a correlation between authoritarian traits and obedience
• Has practical applications — understanding authoritarian personality helps in contexts such as education, parenting, and preventing radicalisation
• Links personality development to early childhood experiences, consistent with developmental theories

Weaknesses

• The F-scale suffers from response bias — all statements are worded in the same direction, so people who tend to agree with statements will score high regardless of content (acquiescence bias)
• The theory cannot explain why entire populations sometimes show high obedience (e.g. Germany in the 1930s–40s) — it is unlikely that millions of people all had authoritarian personalities
• The research is correlational — it shows that authoritarian personality is associated with obedience, but does not prove it causes obedience
• Milgram argued that situational factors are more important than personality — 65% of his participants obeyed to the maximum, suggesting that the situation, not personality, was the primary factor
• The theory may reflect the political climate of the time it was developed (post-WWII anti-fascism)

---

Situational vs Dispositional Debate

Approach	Key Argument	Key Evidence
Situational (Milgram)	The situation is the main factor — ordinary people obey in powerful situations	65% of Milgram's participants obeyed to 450V; variations showed situational factors changed obedience rates
Dispositional (Adorno)	Personality traits make some people more prone to obedience	Authoritarian personality correlates with obedience; F-scale measures relevant traits
Interactionist	Both personality and situation interact to determine behaviour	Some people with authoritarian personalities may be even more obedient in high-pressure situations

Most modern psychologists favour an interactionist approach — both personality and situation contribute to obedience.

---

Key Points

• Adorno et al. (1950) proposed the authoritarian personality as a dispositional explanation for obedience.
• Characteristics: extreme obedience, rigid thinking, hostility to out-groups, conventional values.
• Develops from strict, punitive parenting in childhood.
• Measured using the F-scale (Fascism scale).
• Criticisms: acquiescence bias, correlational evidence, cannot explain mass obedience.
• Most psychologists favour an interactionist approach combining situational and dispositional factors.

---

Locus of control as a second dispositional factor

Alongside the authoritarian personality, locus of control (Rotter, 1966) is a widely tested dispositional factor in obedience and conformity research.

• Internal locus of control: individuals believe their outcomes are determined by their own actions. They are more likely to take personal responsibility, question instructions, and resist destructive obedience.
• External locus of control: individuals believe their outcomes are determined by external forces (luck, fate, powerful others). They are more likely to accept orders uncritically and to conform to group pressure.

Research by Blass (1991) re-analysed Milgram-style data and found that participants with an internal locus of control were more likely to resist obedience — especially when they believed the experimenter was trying to manipulate them. This complements the authoritarian personality account: both show that dispositional factors matter, but neither produces strong obedience in the absence of a powerful situation. Importantly, locus of control is learned (through life experience of control or helplessness), so it also challenges any simple biological account of obedience differences.

---

Right-wing authoritarianism and modern research

Altemeyer (1981) refined Adorno's concept into right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), which he argued combines three traits: submission to established authorities, aggression towards those targeted by authority, and conventionalism. Altemeyer's scale addressed the acquiescence bias problem by including reverse-worded items. RWA has been found to correlate with: